EU Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 361 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Excellent organization and clear, accessible courses.
- +Supportive staff and personalized academic attention.
- +Modern facilities and diverse international opportunities.
- +Excellent learning opportunities and practical focus
- +Strong campus facilities and accessibility
- +Supportive professors and international exchange programs
- +Practical, real-world learning and professional faculty
- +Active campus life and cultural experience
- +Comprehensive and complementary degree programmes
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Broadened perspectives and enriched understanding.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Poor leadership and unprofessional management are prevalent.
- -Ineffective teaching quality due to unqualified instructors is a significant problem.
- -Unmotivated or unprepared staff and teaching methods.
- -Overcrowded classes and lack of personal/academic treatment.
- -Poor organization and lack of practical or relevant course content.
- -Low English proficiency of professors and lack of care for Erasmus students.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management hinder academic progress.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create an uncomfortable learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and career support leave students feeling unprepared for the future.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This university garners excellent scores across most aspects. Accommodations stand out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and Professors are also rated highly at 4.14. Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all received a solid score of 4. This indicates a well-rounded institution with particular strengths in student living arrangements and academic personnel.
With an overall balanced profile, this institution excels in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, earning the highest marks in these areas. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Professors** received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. The university also shows solid performance in **Location** and **Value**, with **Facilities** falling within the mid-range.
Academically and experientially, this institution receives solid marks. Professors and facilities are particularly well-regarded, scoring close to 3.9. Student life and value also present favorably. However, accommodation and internationality stand out as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects to match the university's otherwise strong performance.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution garners an outstanding score for its facilities and location. Students also report a positive experience with student life, accommodation, and its international outlook, all receiving solid ratings. While professors are well-regarded, this area presents the only slight dip from the otherwise exceptional scores, suggesting it's the weakest point in an otherwise highly favorable review. Overall, the university offers strong value.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent academic environments, helpful staff, and good organization. One reviewer mentioned unprofessional director and unqualified staff.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting opportunities, good facilities, and positive exchanges. Negative feedback (~16%) cites poor organization and unmotivated staff.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning and faculty expertise. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions low English proficiency from professors and a lack of organization.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars, indicating generally positive feedback. Alternative learning platforms are noted as beneficial for deepening understanding and broadening knowledge. No negative feedback was reported.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Nothing to show
I was here on Erasmus for 1 year and the experience was really excellent. Compared to Italian universities, it is much more practical and applied, with lighter study loads but more focused on a job opportunity. The professors are very friendly and willing to help, especially Erasmus students. I am really satisfied with my experience, the only complaint would be about the economics courses which are not very varied especially the masters and the internationalization office which is quite inefficient and slow
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
