University of Ghana - UG vs University of Erfurt vs Skans School of Accountancy - Nil vs University of Liberia - UL vs Stella Maris Polytechnic University - SMPU

Side-by-side comparison from 259 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: United Methodist University (5.00)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 0/5 categories
University of Erfurt: wins 2/5 categories
Skans School of Accountancy - Nil: wins 0/5 categories
University of Liberia - UL: wins 0/5 categories
Stella Maris Polytechnic University - SMPU: wins 0/5 categories
African Methodist Episcopal University - AMEU : wins 0/5 categories
United Methodist University: wins 3/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: B.A. in Philosophy
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Physics
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.45
4.00
3.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.32
4.48
3.67
2.50
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.25
4.10
3.67
3.50
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.08
4.10
Win
3.33
3.00
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.29
4.18
3.67
3.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.22
4.38
3.67
3.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
3.48
4.13
Win
4.00
1.50
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +Small class sizes and close professor-student relationships
  • +Interdisciplinary approach and critical thinking development
  • +Charming and affordable city with vibrant international campus
  • +Knowledgeable and passionate instructors
  • +Suitable program recommendations
  • +Professional environment
  • +Strong academic foundation & critical thinking skills
  • +Dedicated and supportive professors
  • +Invaluable career preparation

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Caring and exceptional professors
  • +Positive life impact and decisions
  • +Strong post-conflict reconstruction environment
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Overcrowded classes and limited personalized attention.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of support and communication from staff is a common complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

This university garners strong ratings across most aspects, with **Location** standing out as its most impressive attribute. Student life, professors, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated highly, indicating a well-rounded positive experience. The **Facilities** category received the lowest score, suggesting this is an area where improvements could be made to further enhance the student offering.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its facilities and accommodation, both receiving high marks. Its location, student life, and value for money are also well-regarded, averaging a solid 3.67. The weakest area identified is internationality, which scores slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a generally positive profile with specific areas of excellence.

This institution presents a mixed but generally average profile. Its strongest areas include Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all scoring a respectable 3 or 3.5. Facilities and Value also landed at a solid 3. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as a significant weakness with a low rating of 1.5, and Location also falls below the average at 2.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels with top marks in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, indicating a vibrant and well-supported academic and social environment. Accommodation and Internationality also received strong scores. While **Facilities** were rated positively, they represent the lowest-scoring area, suggesting room for enhancement in that regard. Overall, the university offers excellent value.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students praise the university's interdisciplinary social sciences, small seminar groups, and international character. Some wish for more English courses and faster bureaucracy.

With a high average rating of 4.67/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise professors' strong subject knowledge and passion, and appreciate personalized program recommendations that align with budget and facilities.

With one positive review, this university is largely well-regarded. Students highlight a solid academic foundation and dedicated professors. Negative feedback is minimal, representing approximately 0% of the feedback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is a perfect 5/5. The feedback highlights exceptional professors who truly cared, indicating highly positive sentiment.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
40%
67%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
47%
60%
33%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
11%
0%
0%
50%
100%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

Intersubjectivity

Our university offers only double degree bachelors. That is the most interesting and frustrating thing that could ever happen to you. On the one hand, you only get half knowledge of everything, our professors cant teach us deeply during one course and the two faculties make you change your mindset every class. But on the other hand, you can dive into topics deeply thanks to the open structure, I learned how to think interdisciplinary and I learned how to think critically even in the discipline I study. Erfurt is an amazing student city and even though the university itself can be very unorganized, everything works out somehow because we have a very helpful climate with each other. Studying at Erfurt was honestly one of my best decisions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close