Texas A&M - TAMU vs De Montfort University - DMU vs STI Colleges vs University of Perpetual Help System Dalta - UPHSD vs Dr. Filemon C. Aguilar Memorial College of Las Piñas - DFCAMC
Side-by-side comparison from 114 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong community and connections
- +Quality academics and professors
- +Abundant activities and traditions
- +Engaging professors with subject passion and practical teaching
- +Strong academic quality and research opportunities
- +Supportive learning environment with industry connections and extracurriculars
- +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
- +Flexible learning options and quality education
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Relevant career preparation and entrepreneurship focus
Nothing to show
- +Accessible education and scholarships
- +Quality education and academic reputation
- +Personal growth and development through activities
- +Diverse and in-depth program options.
- +Inspiring and enriching artistic environment.
- +Opportunities for individual creative development.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and course structure causes confusion.
- -Poor academic quality and lack of progression to higher education.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful faculty, with vague or harsh feedback.
- -Technical issues with submitting work.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance
- -Unresponsive administration and management
- -Lack of academic support and clear communication
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of student engagement and ineffective communication are also significant concerns.
This institution is highly regarded across several key areas, excelling particularly in Student Life (4.45) and Value (4.42). Internationality also received a strong score (4.32). The university demonstrates good performance in Facilities (4.26) and Professors (4.26), with Accomodation also scoring well (4.1). Location, while still positive, is the weakest rated aspect among the surveyed categories (3.84).
With a generally positive evaluation, this university excels in its **Location** (4.35) and **Student Life** (4.33). **Facilities** also received a high score (4.32), closely followed by **Internationality** (4.30). While **Accomodation** (4.13) and **Value** (4.12) are still solid, **Professors** (4.07) represent the lowest-rated aspect among the surveyed categories.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its **Location** and **Value**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors** and **Accomodation** are also rated strongly at 4.17. **Student Life** is well-regarded at 4.0. The areas with the lowest scores are **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both averaging 3.83.
Nothing to show
This university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are particularly well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and internationality also score highly. Facilities and accommodation are rated well, as is the overall value. The location, while good, is the lowest-rated category but still solid.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Conversely, its location received a rating of zero, indicating a significant weakness in this aspect of the university experience.
With ~86% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.33/5, students praise strong professor and peer connections, a friendly community, and the Aggie Network. Some mention needing to actively search for assistance. No 1-2 star reviews were present.
~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic quality, engaging professors, and great facilities. A small amount of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions challenges with accessibility and feedback quality for some courses.
All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise flexible learning, high academic standards in specific courses like nursing, and supportive professors. Some mention areas for facility improvement.
Nothing to show
Nearly all (approximately 100%) of 14 reviews are positive, highlighting quality education, interactive classes, approachable professors, and personal growth opportunities. No negative feedback was recorded.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with the student highlighting the enriching and inspiring experience. They specifically praised the wide variety of courses and the depth of programs like graphic design and typography.
Nothing to show
Regrettably, I cannot offer a recommendation for Comic and Concept art due to the following reasons: Firstly, the accessibility of the teachers proved to be quite challenging as they were unresponsive to multiple email attempts throughout the entire year. Moreover, the feedback provided was often overly vague and lacked constructive criticism, occasionally even being unnecessarily harsh. In some instances, no feedback was given at all. Submitting work was frequently an arduous task, as specific file formats were required that were incompatible with the content, such as demanding PDFs for documents that couldn't be formatted accordingly and were subsequently rejected. Furthermore, the lessons themselves were lacking in quality. Some lecturers would digress into unrelated topics, consuming valuable class time. The teaching approach was disappointingly minimal, with students being assigned tasks without any guidance or instructional techniques provided. If feedback was given, it was generally unhelpfully brief, merely stating that improvements were needed. The learning materials provided during the lessons were also subpar. Often, we were presented with pre-recorded 10-minute videos and expected to navigate our own way through the material. This lack of effort on the part of the lecturers was unfair and disheartening, making it challenging for students to invest their own efforts. The workload imposed on students was excessive and overwhelming, leading to the majority falling behind. Consequently, many students experienced a negative impact on their mental well-being, ultimately resulting in some dropping out. Additionally, the university failed to provide necessary information about the course, leaving students to rely on each other for essential details. Timetables and key information, including student cards, were significantly delayed without any valid explanation. Technological tools such as email, Blackboard, Teams, and attendance systems frequently malfunctioned, causing further frustration and hindrance to the learning experience. Tragically, instances of bullying were pervasive both within the classroom and online, including incidents targeting vulnerable individuals. Despite reporting these matters to the course leader, no action could be taken without the full names of the involved students, which was a requirement I couldn't fulfill. Regrettably, when I brought these concerns to the attention of the class representatives, they chose to ignore my pleas for assistance. Lastly, living in Leicester City proved to be unsafe, with prevalent cases of sexual harassment, homophobic and transphobic threats. Disturbingly, both the police and the university failed to take any meaningful action in response to these issues.
In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
y time in UCB has been one of the most memorable and precious parts of my teen life. It was where I experienced so many firsts—new friendships, challenges, and moments that shaped who I am today. Every day brought something new to learn, not just in the classroom, but about life, people, and myself. UCB became more than just a place to study—it was a space where I grew, laughed, stumbled, and stood back up. Those years will always hold a special place in my heart, a chapter filled with growth and unforgettable memories. uring my time as a senior high student at the University of Cebu Banilad campus, I learned how to be flexible and adaptable. Balancing academics, responsibilities, and personal life wasn’t always easy, but it taught me the value of time and resilience. Along the way, I met new friends who stood by me through every high and low. They’ve become some of the people I treasure the most, turning ordinary days into unforgettable ones. With them, I discovered not just how to manage life, but how to enjoy it fully—even in the busiest moments.
Nothing to show
