Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universidade de Santiago de Compostela - USC vs UIC Barcelona vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 108 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Passionate professors and rich academic/research opportunities
- +Vibrant community, student organizations, and diverse activities/services
- +Strong networking, career guidance, and international support
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Supportive and competent professors
- +Modern facilities and enjoyable student life
- +Diverse, multicultural environment
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Small class sizes and quality teaching
- +Strong design and artistic programs
- +European exchange opportunities
- +Teacher dedication and real-world focus
- +Integrated and close learning environment
- +Growing campus and accessible transportation
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Lack of practical and useful course content.
- -Teachers with no vocation and poor teaching skills.
- -Outdated teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are major drawbacks.
- -Poor course structure and irrelevant content are frequently criticized.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning and student support.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective study.
- -Lack of clear communication and feedback creates frustration.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
Student life stands out as the university's strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, facilities were rated lowest among the surveyed categories. Professors, location, internationality, and value all received solid scores, with accommodation also performing well. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong showing, particularly in student engagement and campus life.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
This institution garners exceptional acclaim, particularly for its impressive **Facilities** (4.61), **Professors** (4.59), **Student Life** (4.52), and **Value** (4.55). Internationality also stands out at 4.67. The **Location** (3.99) and **Accomodation** (4.03) received the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Excelling in several key areas, this institution receives top marks for its facilities, accommodation, and internationality. Conversely, areas for improvement include professors and student life, both scoring moderately. The location and overall value are also rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded academic environment with specific strengths in physical resources and global engagement.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** is the weakest point, scoring a moderate three. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value are rated positively at a solid four.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate professors and rich academic/extracurricular opportunities. A small portion (around 4%) express concerns about practicality and teaching methods.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With an average rating of 4.38/5, nearly all (95%+) reviews are positive. Students highlight supportive professors, an international environment, and modern facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With a 4/5 average rating from 1 review, ~100% of feedback is positive. The single positive review highlights strong design programs, small class sizes, good teaching quality, and a charming city location. There is no negative feedback.
With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting good teacher-student relationships and real-world focused teaching.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
