SKEMA Business School vs Middlesex University - MDX vs Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Birmingham Dubai - UOBD
Side-by-side comparison from 484 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Practical, relevant, and industry-standard course content
- +Passionate, supportive, and approachable lecturers
- +Diverse, inclusive, and vibrant campus community
- +Diverse student body and global community
- +Strong academic programs and industry-relevant knowledge
- +Supportive faculty and excellent placement support
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Excellent lecturers, teaching quality, and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Great campus facilities, infrastructure, and well-planned spaces.
- +Diverse student community with many societies and extracurricular activities.
- +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
- +Supportive community and approachable staff
- +Relevant industry connections and practical learning
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized as being ineffective.
- -High tuition fees and poor job placement rates are a major concern.
- -Limited and often damaged recreational facilities detract from the student experience.
- -The university offers a poor value for money regarding services provided.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as rigid and lacking relevance by many.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources frustrate students.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues create confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Limited career support and unclear pathways hinder future prospects.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
Surveyed metrics indicate a generally positive university experience. Professors and Internationality received the highest marks, both above 4.2. Facilities and Student Life also scored well, exceeding 4.1. Location and Value were rated respectably around 4.0. The weakest area, Accommodation, scored significantly lower at 3.6.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, boasting a high rating. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive favorable scores. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** are identified as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. The university presents a mixed but generally positive outlook across its evaluated components.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This institution receives commendable ratings in several key areas, with its **Value** standing out as the strongest at 4.57. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also score very well, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 2.67, indicating a significant need for improvement in this aspect. Other categories such as Facilities and Professors are rated positively, while Location scores moderately.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its professors and internationality, both scoring an impressive 4.5. Students also appreciate the location with a rating of 4.15. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received a 3.54 rating. Facilities and student life both earned a solid 4, while value for money sits at a respectable 3.93.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With a 4.24 average rating from 161 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students praise practical course content, passionate lecturers, and a good campus vibe. No negative reviews were recorded.
With a 4.11/5 average rating from 128 reviews, ~83% praise the university for its diverse student body, supportive environment, and robust academic programs. A small minority (~0.8%) found it expensive with limited recreational facilities and placements.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
All 7 reviews are positive, reflecting an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praise excellent lecturers, well-managed timetables, great campus life, and quality facilities. The diverse community and engaging extracurricular activities are also recurring themes.
With a strong average rating of 4.14/5 from 14 reviews, students praise engaging lecturers and flexible learning modes. Supportive faculty, industry connections, and a diverse community are recurring themes. There is no negative feedback.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
most teachers are very patient when helping and explaining to student with questions, the time table planning is not great, responsible team is only accepting online request which the reply was always unable to make changes(except health related issues )
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
