Universidad Metropolitana de Monterrey - UMM vs Technical University of Moldova - UTM vs 'Angel Kanchev' University of Ruse vs University of the Free State - UFS UV vs University of Oulu - OY
Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Dedicated teachers and responsive administration
- +Value for money despite fee increases
- +Support for student feedback
- +Quality education with knowledgeable and inspiring faculty
- +Opportunities for extracurricular involvement and scientific activities
- +Well-equipped facilities including advanced laboratories and gyms
- +Excellent facilities and knowledgeable, kind teaching staff.
- +Acquisition of new skills and knowledge.
- +Positive social experience and meeting new people.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Inclusive and vibrant campus environment
- +Strong academic programs and focus on student success
- +High-quality education and strong programs, especially in ICT and wireless technology.
- +Supportive and international learning environment with modern facilities.
- +Good city life, student culture, and career preparation support.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources were a significant drawback.
- -Lack of engagement and outdated curriculum led to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and teaching methods.
- -Poor teaching quality and outdated faculty.
- -Limited options and external interference.
- -Rude administration and dismissive professors.
- -Outdated teaching materials and lack of academic standards.
- -Disrespectful and overly critical treatment of students.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of opportunities and insufficient academic resources.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of effective teaching and engaging curriculum is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Offering a consistent score of zero across all evaluated categories, this institution presents a uniform picture in its current ratings. There are no distinct strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as all aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, are rated equally low.
This university demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in its **location** and **student life**, both earning high marks of 4. Professors also received a strong rating of 4. Areas requiring improvement include accommodation, scoring 3, and its internationality, which received the lowest rating at 2.75. The university also offers a solid value proposition and good facilities.
Academic strengths shine through for this institution, with Professors receiving the highest score at 6.9. Location also garners a solid 6.8. Areas for potential improvement include Student Life and Accomodation, both scoring 5.8, alongside Internationality at 5.7, and Facilities at 5.9, indicating these aspects are the least highly rated by students.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly in **Student Life** and **Value**, both exceeding 4.5. **Facilities** also score highly at 4.49. The university's weakest area is **Internationality**, rated at 3.83, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. Other categories, including **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accomodation**, fall within a solid range of 4 to 4.34.
This institution excels significantly in its **Facilities** and **Value**, both receiving near-perfect scores. **Accomodation** is also a strong point. Conversely, the **Location** is the weakest area, indicating potential drawbacks in this aspect. **Student Life** and **Internationality** show moderate performance, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a vibrant campus experience and a more global outlook.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The sole review is positive, rating the university 4 out of 5 stars. It praises good teachers who care about student learning, while also noting consistent tuition fee increases.
~55% of reviews are positive, highlighting extracurriculars, good professors, and advanced labs. ~9% express dissatisfaction with teaching quality and faculty, noting limited alternatives. The average rating is 3.73/5.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is split, with positive reviews highlighting valuable experiences and acquired skills, while negative comments indicate issues with administrative treatment and faculty carelessness.
With an average rating of 4.46/5 from 41 reviews, ~90% of feedback is positive. Students highlight academic excellence, great lecturers, and a positive campus environment. There are no negative reviews provided.
All 7 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the high-quality education, excellent facilities, and supportive, international environment, particularly in ICT and health tech. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
UTM teaches old materials in the IT field, every day this world is developing and UTM all but not so fast that the technologies that appear every day. There is too much material in the study program that takes a lot of time to study, and students fail to understand normally the field they are taught.
Nothing to show
UFS is a beautiful university, its level of education is amazing, quality and high. Another thing I like about it is diversity of students and teachers who are attending this university. I highly recommend it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
