Czech University of Life Sciences Prague vs Bogazici University vs Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences - SeAMK vs Istituto Lorenzo de' Medici - LDM vs Kirinyaga University
Side-by-side comparison from 91 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse international community
- +High educational standards and comprehensive, practical programs
- +Excellent international relations and globally recognized degrees
- +World-class faculty and supportive professors
- +Enriching academic and campus experience
- +Strong career preparation and diverse opportunities
- +International environment and intercultural exchange
- +Supportive staff and excellent student guidance
- +Diverse and flexible study programs with practical skills
Nothing to show
- +Strong student support and timely graduation
- +Knowledgeable and supportive teaching staff
- +Technological advancement and diverse leadership
- +Rigorous and relevant curriculum
- +High-quality faculty with industry experience
- +Practical application of knowledge
Nothing to show
- -Experiencing biased treatment and bullying from professors, especially regarding language proficiency.
- -Witnessing unfair grading practices where Czech students receive preferential treatment over international students.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Communication problems and lack of clear information cause confusion.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance are major concerns.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are problematic.
- -Limited career support and poor job prospects are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and relevant course content is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
Academic and student life aspects of this university stand out, with Facilities and Student Life both scoring an impressive 4.18. Value also received a strong rating of 4. Areas for potential improvement include Location and Accommodation, which scored lower at 3.5 and 3.4 respectively. Professors and Internationality received solid mid-range scores, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these areas.
This academic institution receives commendable ratings across several key aspects. Notably, **Location** stands out with the highest score. **Student Life** and **Value** also perform strongly, indicating positive student experiences and perceived benefits. However, **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Other evaluated aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Internationality are rated favorably.
Overall, the university receives high marks. Student life stands out as the strongest area, closely followed by facilities and internationality. Accommodations and location also score very well. Value for money is a notable strength. The professors' ratings, while still good, represent the weakest area in this assessment.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in academic quality, with professors receiving a near-perfect rating of 4.6 and value for money scoring an outstanding 4.7. Student life also scores highly at 4.53. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include internationality at 3.9, and facilities and accommodation both at 4.15.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all achieving a perfect 5. Facilities, Professors, Accommodation, and Value are also well-regarded with a solid 4. There are no particularly weak areas, with all scores being strong.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83%), highlighting a great atmosphere, campus life, and diverse study opportunities. A small minority (~8.3%) encountered challenges with accents and perceived unfairness in oral exams.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%) from students, highlighting world-class academics, supportive professors, and enriching campus life. A small amount of negative feedback (~0%) was noted.
Students praise SEAMK for its international environment, supportive staff, and diverse courses. The learning atmosphere is described as friendly and inclusive, with excellent guidance and opportunities for intercultural exchange. No negative feedback was provided in the sample.
Nothing to show
With 18 out of 20 reviews being positive (90%), students highly praise the university's student administration, learning experiences, and knowledgeable, supportive lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded.
With one review and an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the enriching academic experience and relevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
In overall that was a sad experience unfortunately as instead of concentrating on the learning you had to be stressing out on how strong your accent was in Czech in order not to get another portion of bullying from professors for where you’re from. Oral part of each exam was a total madness as again, Czech students were lucky to get a mark 3 just for a couple of words, while Russian students were kept for 40 min and still were left with “not succeeded” results. We were all in the same room, so we witnessed that with our own eyes. Due to that a lot of Russian students had to repeat the program twice and graduate not in 3 years, but in 4-6 years. I’m glad a few professors were sane and very pleasant people, but mostly Economical faculty especially Business Administration program in Czech language was a nightmare for students from Russia. We were so happy to finally graduate at least for Bachelor program and never to continue with this horrible faculty PEF specialty Podnikani a Administrativa (in cz) again. I’m taking about time period 2013-2019, hopefully those professors are not there anymore. For the sake of my objective opinion, I’m happy to mention that I’ve been working for a big international company for many years now, I speak several languages fluently and accents were never a problem in the international environment, but for this university it did unfortunately. I’m so happy I’m not a student anymore and I don’t recommend to study in Czech for any foreigners here in Prague , rather choose English programs even in the same faculty PEF at this university.
What I love the most about Boğaziçi is of course the amazing campus and the view of the beautiful Bosphorus. The campus life in Boğaziçi is what I will miss the most when I graduate. I also really enjoy my degree, I like the quality of the courses that are taught in my department. The professors are available and easy to communicate with most of the time. The student clubs are also very active and I’m lucky to be a part of the activities organized by the clubs. The workload is usually way more than the other European universities but it only allows you to achieve more and learn more.
The school has great facilities and modern equipment. Teachers have huge amount of knowledge and are well informed about new technologies. The studying is made mostly in a way that the student doesn't have to buy expensive books or equipments. Also the school is really investing on being international and there is lot of collaboration between different schools from different countries although they should advertise about exchange programs more.
Nothing to show
This university is the best place to be, the student admin coordination is so amazing,, it is rare to hear students complaining about not graduating because they missed some marks. I can recommend this university again and again.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
