Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz vs Hochschule Mainz vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences vs New European College vs Hochschule Fresenius

Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: New European College (4.90)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz: wins 0/7 categories
Hochschule Mainz: wins 0/7 categories
Macromedia University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
New European College: wins 6/7 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 1/7 categories
University of Koblenz and Landau: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Mainz, Germany
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Media Studies
Munich, Germany
4.90
Top
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: BBA Specialization Marketing and Communication
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
4.21
Win
3.67
Not rated
3.83
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
4.77
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.92
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.86
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.58
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
4.93
Win
3.67
Not rated
4.92
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
4.62
Win
3.33
Not rated
4.08
Value
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.79
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.17
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.14
Win
3.00
Not rated
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible academic arrangements
  • +Excellent conference interpreting program

Nothing to show

  • +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
  • +Valuable real-world experience through company work
  • +Supportive and understanding staff
  • +Supportive, family-like community and approachable, helpful lecturers
  • +Personalized attention and mentorship throughout the academic journey
  • +Beyond academics, including city orientation and flexible admissions
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
  • -A lack of student support and engagement is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
  • -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
  • -Unresponsive or ineffective administrative and management support.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication regarding academic and administrative matters.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
Rating summary
What students say

Across all surveyed categories, the university received a consistent rating of zero for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This suggests no specific area stands out as a strength or weakness, with all aspects performing at the same undeveloped level. The uniform lack of positive scores indicates a need for significant development across the entire institution.

Nothing to show

Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Overall, this university receives very positive ratings from students. The strongest areas of performance are Internationality, with a near-perfect score, closely followed by Professors and Location. Accomodation and Facilities represent the weakest, though still generally favorable, aspects of the student experience. The university also scores well in Student Life and Value.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

Nothing to show

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The feedback indicates a positive experience, highlighting the possibility of negotiating deadlines and schedules. There is no negative feedback present.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.

Students praise NEC for its personal attention from approachable lecturers and a supportive, family-like community. The college exceeded expectations, offering a valuable experience beyond academics.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
33%
87%
33%
0%
67%
4★
100%
0%
0%
13%
67%
0%
25%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
8%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A good and renowned university

I liked studying at the Johannes Gutenberg University. Sometimes the organization was not the best but in general, it is still better than average. It is also possible to negotiate deadlines and sometimes even time table with lecturers and professors. As far as recommendation concerned, I can only speak about conference interpreting, and in this case, the university should be the choice #1.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Second to First: Discovering Excellence at NEC

Initially, NEC was not my first choice of university, but one of the top three when choosing a master programme. This was due to a specific programme I was searching for not being offered. As my enquiry progressed, this university quickly became my first choice. The staff was very responsive and fast, made up of some of the kindest people I have met. They were able to guide me through the process and answer all the questions I had. Further, the chancellor has been very hands on from the beginning of the journey, with an open inbox and an open door. He is able to help his students not only in relation to the university but any guidance which is needed for students in a new city or country. The professors chosen have been a part of NEC for many years and bring a wide variety of industry knowledge. Their unique master programme has been exciting, interesting and relevant to the current day scenarios. It has been the right amount of challenging but all worth it. The environment is one of the most welcoming and supportive that I have ever experienced, and I would recommend New European College to anyone who is passionate about their future and education.

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Nothing to show

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close