Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs University of Craiova vs Spiru Haret University vs Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA
Side-by-side comparison from 121 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
- +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
- +Helpful and dedicated professors
- +Valuable student opportunities and international programs
- +Well-structured and understandable curriculum
- +Accessible and flexible for working students
- +Competent and available teachers
- +Modern facilities and engaging courses
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Relevant and enriching programmes
- +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
Nothing to show
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic foundation with practical application
- +Well-equipped facilities for hands-on learning
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
- -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -lack of clarity in course structure and grading
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
- -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are prevalent concerns.
The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its Location, receiving the highest rating. Professors also perform exceptionally well. Conversely, the Facilities received the lowest rating, indicating an area for potential improvement. Student Life and Accomodation also fall within a moderate range, while Internationality and Value present further opportunities for growth.
This institution garners its highest marks for Professors and Location, both receiving a strong 4.25. Its Value is also notable at a perfect 4. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.25. Facilities and Accommodations fall in the mid-range with solid 3.75 ratings.
This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves excellent marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in Professors (5), Accomodation (4.67), and Value (4.67). Internationality and Location also score highly at 4.33. Student Life is well-regarded at 4. The primary area for improvement appears to be Facilities, which received the lowest rating at 3.67.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
Positive feedback (~100%) highlights empathetic professors and detailed, flexible courses. Students also appreciate the opportunities offered, despite some facilities being older.
With a 4/5 average rating from 4 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight accessible learning and available teachers. No negative feedback was provided.
With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.
Nothing to show
With 100% positive sentiment, reviews highlight great teachers, knowledgeable professors, and excellent academic foundations. Students appreciate strong theoretical and practical courses, well-equipped facilities, and modern resources for skill development.
Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show