Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs ITCA Fepade vs Groupe ESA – École Supérieure D'Agricultures D'Angers vs Canadian Tourism College - CTC vs Poojya Doddappa Appa College of Engineering

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ITCA Fepade (5.00)
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN: wins 0/7 categories
ITCA Fepade: wins 6/7 categories
Groupe ESA – École Supérieure D'Agricultures D'Angers: wins 0/7 categories
Canadian Tourism College - CTC: wins 0/7 categories
Poojya Doddappa Appa College of Engineering: wins 0/7 categories
Higher School of Economics and Business - ESEN: wins 1/7 categories
JPTS Institute Of Science, Management And Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Santa Tecla, El Salvador
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Technical Manager
Best programme: Business Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.70
3.00
Location
4.08
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.36
Win
4.00
Professors
3.83
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.55
4.00
Internationality
2.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.18
4.00
Student life
3.60
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.64
Not rated
Value
3.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.82
4.00
Accommodation
3.27
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs with industry-experienced professors
  • +Flexible schedules supporting work-study balance
  • +Good job prospects and practical preparation for the professional market
  • +Engaging and innovative teaching methods
  • +Feeling productive and proactive during studies

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and strong academic programs.
  • +Supportive student community and emphasis on practical application.
  • +Rigorous environment fostering professional development and leadership skills.
  • +Engaging opportunities and open opinion sharing
  • +Strong career prospects and support
Cons
  • -Poor management and communication, particularly concerning administrative tasks.
  • -Outdated curriculum and overly long program duration.
  • -Unattractive facilities and uninspiring campus environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a concern.
  • -Teaching quality and course relevance are frequently criticized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and lack of course relevance frustrate students.
  • -Lack of accessible and helpful administrative support.
  • -Inadequate or outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganization from the institution.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives its highest marks for location, followed closely by professors and value. Conversely, its internationality rating is notably the lowest among the surveyed categories. Facilities and accommodation also received mid-range scores, while student life achieved a respectable standing.

This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received perfect scores, indicating a highly satisfactory experience in these domains. The weakest area identified is location, which received a moderate rating of 3, suggesting it may be a less defining strength compared to the other overwhelmingly positive aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in **Value**, receiving a rating of 4.82, and **Facilities**, scoring 4.7. Student life and accommodation also rank highly at 4.64 and 4.67 respectively. The university's **Internationality** stands out as its weakest area, with a rating of 4.18, though all other aspects of the student experience are positively reviewed.

This institution achieves strong ratings in several key areas, notably Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a solid 4. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation received zero ratings, indicating significant areas for improvement. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good education and job prospects, often with experienced professors. ~14% of feedback is negative, citing outdated curricula, poor management, and unappealing infrastructure.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, around 100%. Students appreciate modern teaching methods, finding them productive and engaging. There are no reported negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All 11 reviews are positive (100%), with students praising academic excellence, professors' passion and patience, and strong student camaraderie. The challenging environment fosters professional development and leadership skills.

This single review offers a positive outlook, highlighting the university's great ideas, opportunities, convenience, and excellent career prospects. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
100%
0%
0%
0%
73%
0%
4★
36%
0%
0%
0%
0%
27%
100%
3★
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close