Kenyatta University vs St. Paul's University - SPU vs Daystar University vs The Catholic University of Eastern Africa vs Railways Training Institute - RTI
Side-by-side comparison from 321 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +- Knowledgeable and supportive lecturers
- +- Well-structured and balanced curriculum
- +- Opportunities for innovation and practical application
- +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Peaceful, positive learning environment and personal growth focus
- +Quality education and strong academic performance leading to career success
- +Engaging and practical academic programs with knowledgeable, supportive lecturers
- +Student-centered approach with responsive administration and flexible course options
- +Enriching student life through fun events, trips, and diverse learning environments
- +Supportive and intellectually stimulating environment
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +Relevant and tailored course material
- +Practical, engaging learning with immediately applicable skills.
- +Unique, specialized programs in niche fields.
- +Quality campus facilities and resources.
- +Passionate and knowledgeable professors
- +Extensive student support and resources
- +Engaging learning environment
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including disorganization and delays.
- -Unfair and punitive grading systems compared to other institutions.
- -Lack of specialization in some programs, leading to career uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Concerns about bias and institutional agendas impact academic integrity.
- -Lack of communication and support from lecturers.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum is disappointing.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
Nothing to show
This university garners strong ratings across multiple facets, with Location being its standout strength at 4.55. Professors and Facilities also received high marks, scoring 4.36 and 4.41 respectively. Value and Student Life are similarly well-regarded. The area requiring the most improvement is Accomodation, which received the lowest score at 3.95. Internationality also sits in the mid-range.
This university demonstrates excellent performance in student life, achieving a high rating of 4.71. Value for money and facilities also scored very well, at 4.73 and 4.63 respectively. Internationality stands out as the area with the lowest score, at 4.27, suggesting room for growth in this aspect. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with a particularly vibrant student experience.
Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance, with exceptional ratings in **Value** (4.52) and **Facilities** (4.48). **Internationality** (4.36) also received high marks. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, scoring 3.93. Other aspects like Professors, Location, and Student Life are rated favorably, generally above 4.2.
This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its location receiving the highest marks at 4.72. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.14, alongside professors at 4.09 and student life at 4.05. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, scoring 3.68, followed closely by facilities at 3.91.
The institution receives very positive evaluations, with its location standing out as the strongest area. Professors and student life also earned high marks. Areas for improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score. Facilities, accommodation, and value were rated solidly in the middle.
With perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received top marks. There are no weak areas identified, indicating a consistently outstanding university experience and offering.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.46/5 from 228 reviews, ~98% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers, well-structured courses, and supportive campus life. Minimal negative feedback noted issues with grading systems and project stage disorganization.
With a 4.54/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback across 26 reviews, students praise St. Paul's University's supportive lecturers, practical courses, and peaceful learning environment, fostering personal and professional growth.
A significant majority (~97.6%) of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging academics, supportive lecturers, and student-centered approaches. A single negative review mentioned potential influence from powerful groups.
The university receives largely positive reviews (~77%), with students highlighting a supportive academic environment, knowledgeable faculty, and good facilities. A small fraction (~5%) of feedback points to issues with communication, infrastructure, and strict rules.
All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight practical modules, engaging lecturers, and valuable skills gained from their learning experiences. The university's unique rail and road courses and central Nairobi location were also appreciated.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight knowledgeable professors and a rich array of resources for success, including excellent library, labs, and strong support services.
Nothing to show
It was amazing, the professors were great. The school compound was extremely big and walking from one lecture hall to another was a big challenge. The long ques during meals at the mess was crazy. There is this thing called missing marks, you could visit exam office a million times without help.
Nothing to show
Daystar University gtaught me the importance of expressing myself and respectfully disagreeing with opinions that i djid not subscribe to. The university taught me that as much as i am leader i should not be afraid to be hands on on any given task in life and work space. A servant leader leads by example and does not instill fear to those he is leading.
As a first-year Bachelor of Science (Computer Science) student, I can confidently say this university is a complete disappointment. The lack of communication between lecturers and students is shocking—emails go unanswered, and there’s no support when issues arise. The infrastructure is falling apart—old, broken chairs that look like they belong in a primary school, dusty classrooms, and ancient computers that barely function (some seem to be from the early 2000s!). How are we supposed to learn modern computer science on relics? The online unit registration is a nightmare—it’s glitchy, unreliable, and has caused me to lose crucial units. Shockingly, even the fundamental computer science unit (the core of the degree!) was missing from allocations. The administration does nothing to fix these issues. Lecturers are unreliable—showing up late or not at all, with no makeup classes. The systems are always slow, and there are zero extracurricular activities, making campus life dull and isolating. Save your time and money—this place is a scam. If you actually care about your education, look elsewhere.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
