Universidad Dr. José Gregorio Hernández - UJGH vs ESSEC Business School vs University of Applied Sciences Europe vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez - UNESR vs Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava - STU
Side-by-side comparison from 75 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent teaching quality and student preparation
- +Accessible costs and flexible schedules
- +Comfortable and safe facilities
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Dynamic and accessible educational environment with committed professors.
- +Diverse and flexible academic programs.
- +Encouragement of creativity, research, and social commitment.
- +Comprehensive preparation for life's challenges
- +Ample opportunities for study and practical work experience
- +Widely accepted European degree providing sufficient living standards
- +Quality education and diverse academic programs
- +Supportive professors and positive learning environment
- +Opportunities for personal growth and skill development
- +Strong business and management programs
- +Active student life and extracurricular activities
- +Qualified and dedicated teaching staff
- -Excessive administrative burdens and unresponsive management.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Lack of clear communication and confusing policies.
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
Nothing to show
- -Poor academic organization and lack of essential resources like laboratories.
- -Frequent absence of teaching staff due to low salaries and poor compensation.
- -University unpreparedness for complex degree programs.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Many students are unhappy with the outdated facilities and lack of resources.
- -There are recurring complaints about poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause delays and lack of support.
- -Absent key leadership figures create a sense of neglect.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of academic support hinder progress.
Considering all surveyed aspects, the university presents a consistent, though unexceptional, profile. Its strengths and weaknesses are not clearly delineated as all categories received identical scores. This suggests a uniform, perhaps average, performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Further information would be needed to identify areas for potential improvement or distinction.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
Nothing to show
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Professors and student life stand out as particular strengths. However, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating a significant area for improvement. The university also scored moderately well in facilities, location, internationality, and value, suggesting a generally satisfactory, though not exceptional, experience in these regards.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its **location**, **student life**, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and overall **value**. These aspects are clearly areas of significant investment and positive student experience. Conversely, the **professors** received a comparatively lower rating of 3, suggesting this might be an area for potential improvement when contrasted with its other highly-rated features. The **facilities** also scored well at 4.
This university receives its highest marks for **Location**, with a rating of 4.33. **Professors** are also well-regarded at 3.71. Areas with lower ratings include **Accomodation** (3.00), **Internationality** (3.14), and **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both at 3.29. The overall **Value** is rated at 3.29.
Assessments indicate a university with particular strengths in its academic offerings and surrounding environment. Professors and location both received high marks, suggesting excellent teaching quality and a desirable setting. Student life and accommodation are also well-regarded. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, which received the lowest score, and internationality, though still above average. The overall value proposition is rated positively.
With a 4.33/5 average rating, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent teacher quality and preparation, comfortable facilities, and flexible/accessible schedules as key strengths.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
Nothing to show
90% of reviewers praise the dynamic environment, quality professors, and diverse programs. One reviewer noted concerns about professor feedback and missing faculty, representing 10% of feedback.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This feedback is entirely positive, recommending the university for its comprehensive preparation for life's challenges and broad educational opportunities.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting enriching academics and faculty. Some students note administrative issues and a need for more practical resources.
With an average rating of 4/5, students praise the university's reputation, active student life, and qualified teaching staff. Some wish for more practical marketing courses and mention inconsistent administration.
Nothing to show
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
The Simón Rodríguez University had many shortcomings in terms of the study and organization to teach the degree in veterinary medicine, there were not even laboratories and the teaching staff was very infrequent due to the very low salary that the teachers received for their work, the university did not I was prepared to take on a career of that magnitude.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
