ESSEC Business School vs University Mohammed V vs L'École des sciences de l'information - ESI vs International University of Rabat - UIR vs Mohammed VI Polytechnic University - UM6P
Side-by-side comparison from 74 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Well-structured and practical programs
- +Conducive learning environment
- +Strong technical education and research focus
- +Highly valued teachers and rich program offerings
- +Development of essential research and communication skills
- +Dynamic professors and empowering learning
- +Global exposure and international focus
- +Professional development and industry connections
- +High quality education and professors
- +Excellent campus environment and facilities
- +Global partnerships and industry connections
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
- -Poor quality of education and teacher availability.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor international relations support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication leads to confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
This university receives its highest marks for its professors, scoring a notable 3.57. Internationality and value also stand out with strong ratings above 3.38 and 3.45 respectively. Conversely, accommodation is the weakest area, with a rating of 2.7, indicating room for improvement in student housing provisions. Facilities and student life are rated moderately, around 3.2.
This university excels in its **location**, receiving a perfect score, and demonstrates solid performance in **professors** and **internationality**. Conversely, areas needing significant improvement include **facilities**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, all scoring a low 2. The university offers a moderate **value** proposition.
This university garners excellent marks, particularly in **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all scoring an impressive 4.33. Student life and facilities also received solid ratings at 3.67. The weakest area appears to be **Accommodation**, with a rating of 3, and **Location** also scores moderately lower at 3.33. Overall, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in academic and global aspects.
This university achieves a strong overall rating, with particularly high marks for its **Facilities** (4.67) and excellent scores in **Student Life** (4.33), **Accomodation** (4.56), **Internationality** (4.56), and **Value** (4.56). **Professors** also received a commendable rating (4.33). The **Location** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect at 3.78.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
Approximately 42% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable and supportive faculty. Negative feedback, about 25% of reviews, cites poor international relations and administrative delays.
The sole review highlights a rich engineering program with great teachers, fostering research and communication skills. While positive (~100%), it suggests a need for more technical focus and data tools.
With an average rating of 4.67/5 and ~100% positive feedback, students commend modern infrastructure, diverse community, international partnerships, and professional development opportunities. Some mention demanding workloads and high tuition as minor drawbacks.
With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~89%). Students praise the high quality of education, strong academic programs, excellent campus facilities, and valuable global partnerships. No negative feedback was reported.
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
