University of Virginia - UVA vs SKEMA Business School vs New York University - NYU vs Bethune-Cookman University vs William Paterson University - WP
Side-by-side comparison from 350 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong academic programs and well-taught courses
- +unique culture and supportive environment
- +practical skills and career preparation
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Strong academic programs and accomplished faculty
- +Excellent career prospects and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and inclusive community environment
- +Diverse student body and community
- +Academic rigor and engaging faculty
- +Rich internship and research opportunities
- +Modern resources & diverse environment
- +Strong academic staff & faculty
- +High graduation rate
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and transparency causes dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Lack of learning and value for money
- -Significant student debt
- -Administrative & management issues often cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently cited.
- -Poor communication and lack of clarity create confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of support and unresponsive communication are common complaints.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This university garners strong marks across several key areas. Facilities and student life are particularly well-regarded, both scoring above 4.4. Accommodation and internationality also receive high praise. While professors' ratings are slightly lower than other aspects, they remain solid. Location and value are rated comparably, indicating a consistent experience in these domains.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance with particularly high marks for its professors. Facilities also received a very favorable rating. Conversely, student life and accommodation represent the areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores. Internationality and value for money are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality, all scoring 4.5 out of 5. Student life and location are also well-regarded, achieving a solid 4. The university offers good value for money, also rated at 4. While no areas are significantly low, the location and student life are comparatively the least strong, though still very positive.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution garners perfect scores. Strengths are evident in every surveyed category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Conversely, no specific areas lag behind, as all ratings are consistently outstanding.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
With a high average rating of 4.22/5 and no 1-2 star reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise the unique culture, strong academic programs in architecture and engineering, and supportive learning environments.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 123 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive (~99%). Students praise academic rigor, accessible faculty, and diverse community. One negative review expressed regret over student debt.
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback indicates approximately 100% positive sentiment. Students highlighted diversity, research opportunities, internships, and a close-knit academic community as key strengths.
With a 5/5 average rating, the university is highly praised. Students highlight excellent modern resources, faculty diversity, and strong academic staff, particularly in Arts. A high graduation rate is also a notable positive.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
