IÉSEG School of Management vs Université de Lille vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs Ecole de Management IFAG
Side-by-side comparison from 473 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +Supportive and well-trained faculty
- +Relevant and in-depth programs with ample lab work
- +Abundant opportunities and advanced facilities
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
Nothing to show
- +Expert industry professionals and practical industry exposure
- +Challenging but valuable life sciences education
Nothing to show
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of career support and job prospects
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
Nothing to show
- -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
Nothing to show
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
This university garners excellent feedback for its **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both scoring a high 4.12. Internationality is also well-regarded at 3.98. Conversely, **Accommodations** received the lowest rating at 3.74, closely followed by **Location** at 3.76. Professors and Value fall within a similar, moderate range.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its facilities, professors, and internationality, all receiving perfect scores. Student life offers a moderate experience, while its value proposition is highly rated. However, significant drawbacks are evident in its location and accommodation, both of which received zero ratings, indicating these are areas of considerable concern.
Nothing to show
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~84% of feedback), highlighting advanced labs, diverse opportunities, and supportive lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded among the 45 reviews.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's strong life sciences program and industry-experienced professionals. The curriculum is highlighted as valuable, though one review notes it can be stressful.
Nothing to show
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
