United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Politecnico di Milano vs NABA – New Academy of Fine Arts vs Istituto Marangoni vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 143 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Excellent academic quality and challenging, rewarding programs
- +Strong practical focus with real professionals and innovative projects
- +Supportive international environment and experienced supervisors
- +Outstanding teachers and a supportive, family-like community.
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth in a well-resourced environment.
- +An international atmosphere with diverse student interactions.
- +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
- +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Nothing to show
- +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
- +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Teaching quality and student support are poor.
- -Arbitrary grading and disorienting administrative processes are issues.
- -Lack of encouragement for creativity and experimentation is noted.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support, are frequently criticized.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with **Location** and **Value** receiving particularly high marks. **Internationality** also scores well, suggesting a globally engaged environment. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest rated category, indicating potential room for improvement. Ratings for **Professors** and **Student Life** are also solid, contributing to a generally positive perception.
This institution receives commendations across several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Internationality**, with a rating of 4.67. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value are also highly rated, each scoring 4.33. Student Life and Accomodation are solid, both receiving a score of 4.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
With an average rating of 4.06/5 from 82 reviews, approximately 74% of feedback is positive, praising academic quality and research facilities. A small minority (~4.9%) reported issues with teaching performance and support.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.38/5. Students consistently praise outstanding teachers, a supportive environment with compassionate individuals, and abundant resources, fostering personal growth and strong connections.
With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.
Nothing to show
I have experienced a lot of personalities in this university, some lecturers are very rude when you ask questions, like the thought of you even being slightly confused at what theyre saying is a crime, while some are eager to answer your questions and even welcome it, all in all i personally focus on the good ones because i am here for a purpose. But if you're really sensitive and these things are what you look out for, then this might come as a shock to you.
I liked the ambiant, the friendly people, professional professors, the care of details. I had the opportunity to improve myself and find out more about me, my skills and what I'm looking for in a job.
I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .
