United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Politecnico di Milano vs University of Milano-Bicocca - UNIMIB vs POLIMI Graduate School of Management vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 164 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Excellent academic quality and research opportunities
- +Practical learning with industry professionals
- +Well-organized admissions and clear communication
- +Excellent academic environment and qualified professors
- +Well-organized facilities and supportive student life
- +Opportunities for interaction and personal growth
- +Innovative and forward-looking curriculum
- +Strong career development and industry connections
- +Flexible and student-friendly learning environment
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Nothing to show
- +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
- +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and teaching staff offer poor support.
- -Course content and teaching quality are disappointing.
- -Assessment methods are arbitrary and frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Lack of personal attention and feeling like a number
- -Concerns about professor qualifications
- -Excessive administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of practical application and unclear curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with particular strengths in its value for money, internationality, and location, all scoring above 4.2. Student life and professors also received high marks around 4.1. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.71, followed closely by facilities at 3.99.
This university scores strongest in **Location**, receiving a rating of 3.77. **Facilities** and **Value** also perform well, both hovering around 3.63. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a rating of 2.99, closely followed by **Internationality** at 3.05. Ratings for **Professors** and **Student Life** fall in the mid-range, indicating a more mixed student experience.
The university scores exceptionally well in Student Life and Internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Its Facilities and Value also stand out with strong ratings of 4.5. Professors and Location are solid at 4.0. The lowest-rated area is Accomodation, with a score of 3.5. This indicates a positive overall experience, particularly for social engagement and global integration.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
Approximately 74% of 80 reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic quality, research facilities, and international environments. A small percentage of feedback (~5%) mentions issues with teaching quality and administrative support.
The university is praised for its modern campus, facilities, and international environment by ~74% of reviewers. Some mention intensive schedules. One reviewer noted poor organization and feeling like a number.
All reviews are positive, with students praising the program's focus on finance technology, career prospects, and the supportive, organized learning environment. The university is described as flexible and student-friendly.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.
Nothing to show
I have experienced a lot of personalities in this university, some lecturers are very rude when you ask questions, like the thought of you even being slightly confused at what theyre saying is a crime, while some are eager to answer your questions and even welcome it, all in all i personally focus on the good ones because i am here for a purpose. But if you're really sensitive and these things are what you look out for, then this might come as a shock to you.
I am following the degree course in Sociology. I'm really happy with how I'm finding myself at this university. I think the professors are very good and available in giving any kind of information. Very active university life with numerous initiatives. Clean and sunny environment. I highly recommend it.
The program offers great technological and concrete competencies of the technology applied to the financial sector. Students are highly motivated and fun to be around. The courses are highly linked to innovative and forward-looking topics and deliver great career prospects.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .
