Rennes School of Business vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Excelia Business School vs Schiller International University vs Ecole Vatel Bordeaux
Side-by-side comparison from 152 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and real-world focused learning
- +International and experienced faculty
- +Welcoming and diverse community
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Academic and personal growth opportunities
- +Diverse student community and good facilities
- +High-quality teaching and relevant, practical programs
- +Strong student support and career development resources
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Practical and hands-on learning
- +Study abroad opportunities and international exposure
- +Professional and passionate professors
- +Supportive community and friendly people
- +Engaging and enriching learning experiences
- +Pleasant and positive study environment
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Poor English communication and support for international students are prevalent.
- -Lack of adequate facilities and resources are noted.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Superficial academic content and lack of depth in courses.
- -Unprofessional training and limited internship/apprenticeship support.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from instructors and the university is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with Student Life (4.35) and Internationality (4.32) emerging as particularly strong aspects. Professors (4.22) and Location (4.25) also received high marks. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, scoring 3.75, while Facilities are rated at 4.03. Value for money is also well-regarded at 4.11.
A robust profile emerges, with exceptional marks for its professors, location, and student life. The university also scores well in internationality and value. Conversely, facilities and accommodation received slightly lower, though still positive, ratings, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.
This university demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in **Internationality** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.26), and **Location** (4.22). Facilities and value also receive solid marks. The weakest area, while still respectable, is **Accomodation** (3.52). Overall, the institution offers a well-rounded experience with distinct advantages in fostering an international and engaging student community.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Across various aspects, this institution demonstrates a strong academic reputation. Professors are exceptionally rated at 4.7, with location and internationality also scoring highly at 4.3. Student life and accommodation are similarly rated at approximately 3.78, while facilities present the weakest area with a score of 3.9. Overall, the university offers good value at 4.2.
With a strong showing in nearly all aspects, the university particularly excels in the quality of its professors, earning a near-perfect score. Facilities and student life also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include accommodation and internationality. Overall, the institution presents a well-rounded experience with a distinct emphasis on academic instruction.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
University reviews are largely positive (~97%), highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and professional development opportunities. A small amount of feedback mentions struggles with language barriers for international students.
With an average rating of 4.74/5 from 19 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, helpful academic support, good facilities, and a diverse community. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
~94% of 52 reviews are positive, highlighting excellent teaching, professors, and career preparation. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions superficial course coverage and a lack of practical value.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight practical, dynamic classes, passionate professors, and beneficial study abroad programs that enhance skills and career prospects. There is no negative feedback.
All six reviews are highly positive, averaging 4.83/5 stars. Students highlight a pleasant learning environment, competent professors, and meeting amazing people. The experience is described as life-enriching and highly recommended.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I found a tight-knit community at Ecole Vatel, with valuable networking and experiential learning opportunities. The intimate setting allows professors to tailor their guidance, equipping students with applicable knowledge and skills. This personalized approach motivated me to reach my full potential and feel better about transitioning into the workforce.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
