Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU vs Tomsk Polytechnic University - TPU vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS

Side-by-side comparison from 75 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tomsk Polytechnic University - TPU (4.80)
Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU: wins 2/7 categories
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 4/7 categories
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU: wins 0/7 categories
Tomsk Polytechnic University - TPU: wins 0/7 categories
Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS: wins 0/7 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/7 categories
Ala-Too International Medical University Bishkek Kyrgyzstan: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
Win
4.14
4.14
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
3.95
4.67
Win
4.64
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.10
4.33
Win
4.18
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Internationality
4.50
Win
4.18
4.39
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Student life
4.75
4.10
4.85
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.20
4.48
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.93
3.99
Win
3.66
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical skills and real-world experience
  • +Supportive environment and positive social life
  • +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +Advanced labs and modern equipment
  • +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
  • +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive staff
  • +Positive student experience and facilities
  • +Strong academic programs and resources

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent teaching methods and technological support
  • +Diverse international student body
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Frustration with administrative and management issues.
  • -Discontent with outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Concerns about curriculum relevance and teaching quality.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.

This institution presents a uniform experience, with all surveyed aspects receiving a neutral rating of zero. No specific areas stand out as particularly strong or weak; facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all assessed identically. The university offers a consistent, albeit undifferentiated, environment across these key metrics.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels in student life, receiving a perfect score. Facilities and location also garnered high marks, both at 4. Conversely, professors, accommodation, and internationality present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.5. The university demonstrates good value with a rating of 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.

With 100% positive feedback, students highlight high-quality education and remarkable professors. Recurring themes include a family-like atmosphere within departments and excellent facilities such as the library and cafes.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). One student highlighted excellent teaching methods and technological support. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
65%
44%
83%
0%
0%
50%
4★
50%
22%
44%
17%
0%
0%
0%
3★
13%
9%
11%
0%
0%
0%
50%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Polytechnic

'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close