University of Dhaka - DU vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs Sonargaon University - SU vs East West University - EWU vs American International University Bangladesh
Side-by-side comparison from 94 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Vibrant academic and intellectual environment
- +Rich history and prestigious reputation
- +Diverse student community and active campus life
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable faculty
- +Practical learning and industry-relevant skills development
- +Career-oriented and industry-ready focus
- +Supportive faculty and positive campus environment
- +Strong academic standards and career prospects
- +Vibrant campus life with clubs and activities
- +Strong practical learning and real-world application
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Engaging campus life and opportunities
- +High academic quality and skilled graduates
- +Qualified and experienced faculty
- +Vibrant student environment
- +Skilled teachers & strong ICT focus
- +Appreciated institutional system
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Limited career services and support for job prospects are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Focus on profit over education.
- -Lack of genuine concern for student learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent problem.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or not engaging.
- -Disorganized administration and poor communication frustrate students.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities hinder the learning environment.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant course content leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
- -Unsupportive and ineffective teaching staff.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources often hinder learning.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are frequently seen as irrelevant or unengaging.
Generally positive feedback indicates strengths in **Location** (4.31) and **Professors** (4.30). Areas for improvement include **Accomodation** (3.71) and **Facilities** (3.94), which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Student Life (4.17), Value (4.18), and Internationality (3.94) fall within a good middle range.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution excels in its faculty, with professors receiving a strong 4.5 rating. Internationality is also a notable strength at 4. Areas such as facilities, student life, and accommodation represent potential opportunities for improvement, all scoring a moderate 3. The university offers a respectable location and value, with ratings of 3.5 and 3 respectively.
With a strong showing in student life and professors, the university garners solid marks for its faculty and campus atmosphere. Location and value are also well-regarded. However, accommodation presents a notable weakness, receiving the lowest rating. Internationality and facilities, while above average, are areas with room for improvement.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance in its Facilities, receiving a high rating of 4.3, and also scores well for its Professors (4.1) and Value (4.2). Student Life and Internationality are rated moderately at 3.9. The weakest area identified in the ratings is Accomodation, with a score of 3.
Exceptional evaluations were received across all assessed areas. Strengths are evident in every aspect, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No weak areas were identified, indicating a consistently high standard in all surveyed categories.
This institution excels in its facilities, achieving a perfect score. Professors and accommodation also received high marks, indicating strengths in teaching quality and living arrangements. Student life and internationality are rated moderately. The weakest aspect is the location, receiving a score of zero, which significantly impacts the overall perception. Value for money is considered good.
The university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% positive ratings) with an average of 4.37/5. Students highlight a vibrant academic and cultural environment, knowledgeable professors, and diverse opportunities. Minor drawbacks include slow administration and facility improvements needed.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
Reviews show a mixed sentiment, with 1 positive and 1 negative review. Half of the feedback is negative, citing financial focus over education. Positive comments highlight supportive faculty and industry-relevant skills.
With a 3.8/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight a friendly, open campus environment, supportive faculty, and engaging extracurricular activities. Some note competitive admissions and tuition fees.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, practical learning, and supportive faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights academic quality and a vibrant student environment. No negative feedback was reported.
This university receives a perfect 5/5 rating based on one review. The positive feedback highlights an incredible system, skilled teachers, and a strong focus on ICT. No negative feedback was reported.
This university is a great university. The environment of this university is pleasant, we struggle in many ways to study in this university but our university seems like a dream world to many.This university is a great university. The environment of this university is pleasant, we struggle in many ways to study in this university but our university seems like a dream world to many.This university is a great university. The environment of this university is pleasant, we struggle in many ways to study in this university but our university seems like a dream world to many
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
EWU is a private university located in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It was established in 1996 and has since become one of the most prominent private universities in the country. The university offers undergraduate and graduate programs in various fields, including business, science, engineering, law, and social sciences. EWU is accredited by the University Grants Commission of Bangladesh (UGC) and is a member of the Association of Commonwealth Universities (ACU). The faculty at EWU comprises experienced and highly qualified professors who are dedicated to providing quality education to students. The university has a modern campus with good facilities, including computer labs, libraries, and sports facilities. In terms of student life, EWU offers a vibrant and inclusive community that encourages extracurricular activities, cultural events, and community service. The university has several student clubs and organizations that cater to various interests, such as sports, music, and social issues. Overall, East West University is a well-respected institution in Bangladesh that provides quality education and a supportive community to its students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
