London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Coventry University vs University of Hertfordshire - UH vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Eaton Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 1,012 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Wide range of programmes and practical, hands-on learning.
- +Supportive and helpful lecturers with real-world insights.
- +Modern facilities and a positive, diverse campus environment.
- +Supportive tutors and helpful resources
- +Engaging course content with practical application
- +Strong sense of community and social life
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
Nothing to show
- +Caring and supportive faculty
- +Professional growth opportunities and career flexibility
- +Vibrant campus community and social events
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Insufficient support and staff knowledge issues.
- -Financial focus over student well-being and aid.
- -Overcrowding and lack of meaningful international exposure.
- -Delayed result publication and unhelpful professors are major concerns.
- -The facilities are outdated and need modernization.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Inflexible academic policies hinder student progress.
Nothing to show
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
The university demonstrates strong performance in student life, achieving the highest rating. Conversely, its location received the lowest score among the assessed categories. Ratings for facilities, professors, internationality, and value are all generally positive, hovering around the 4.0 mark, while accommodation also scores well. Overall, the university offers a good experience with particular strengths in campus engagement and areas needing improvement in its geographical setting.
With outstanding scores in **Internationality** (4.67), this institution also boasts strong performances in **Facilities** (4.47) and **Professors** (4.47). **Value** (4.45) is also highly rated. The **Accommodation** (4.06) is the lowest scoring area, though still a respectable figure, with **Location** (4.14) and **Student Life** (4.17) also performing moderately well.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves excellent marks in accommodation, with a perfect score, and strong ratings for professors and facilities. Conversely, location and student life represent the weakest aspects. Internationality and value are rated moderately well, indicating a generally positive but uneven profile.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
~99% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, modern facilities, and a wide program range. A small fraction of negative feedback mentioned staff disorganization and lack of support.
With a 4.42 average rating from 98 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong course content, practical application, community, and social life. A small ~2% of reviews mentioned issues with delayed results and professor engagement.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
Nothing to show
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Recurring themes include supportive faculty, numerous professional development opportunities, and a vibrant campus community with social events.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I honestly wouldn’t advise someone to come to this university to be honest. They’re just interested in your money and leave you with no support after that. I’ll advice to spend your money elsewhere because it isn’t worth it AT ALL
I can boldly say that today my research skills have improved drastically because of the skills I learnt in UH. UH not only gives you an opportunity to grow, it gives you the necessary exposure as a student. With the experience garnered from UH, you can compete anywhere in the world. The tutors are exceptionally qualified and always ready to guide you through. Adaora Nwaka LLM,Energy Law and the Environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
