London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Hertfordshire - UH vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Brunel Business School vs Lincoln International Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 471 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive lecturers and accessible help services
- +Inspiring learning experience with practical application
- +Numerous opportunities for connection and involvement
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Applied learning and relevant coursework
- +Strong employability and career support
- +Flexible schedules and learning resources
- +Supportive and friendly staff and environment
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Effective teaching and immediate issue resolution
- +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
- +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
- +Improved trading profitability and understanding
- +engaging and clear teaching
- +helpful feedback and support
- +well-organized and comprehensive curriculum
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Delayed result publication and administrative issues.
- -Unengaging and unapproachable professors.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Unclear communication and bureaucratic processes.
- -Lack of modern resources and support.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a concern.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and learning experiences is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
- -Misleading course accreditation and aggressive company response
- -Poor course delivery and unfulfilled promises
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Internationality is a clear standout, receiving the highest rating. Accommodations, while still strong, represent the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like facilities, professors, and value also score very positively, indicating a well-rounded university experience. Location and student life are also rated well, suggesting a good overall environment for students.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty, with professors receiving a high rating of 4.29. Student life also scores well at 4.08, alongside a strong internationality rating of 4.14. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.0. Conversely, location appears to be the least favored aspect, scoring 3.25. Facilities are moderately rated at 3.85, and accommodation also receives a respectable 3.79.
This institution scores remarkably well, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a perfect 5. Facilities and Value also stand out at 4.5. Location, Student Life, and Accommodations are solid at 4. The weakest area, however, is **Professors**, receiving a rating of 3.5, indicating room for improvement in this specific aspect of the university experience.
Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution received a uniform rating. Its strengths and weaknesses are therefore equally represented, with all categories achieving the same score. The consistent marks suggest a balanced experience, with no single area significantly outperforming or lagging behind others according to the given data.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (96 reviews, ~92%) highlights a supportive learning environment with approachable lecturers and ample opportunities. A few (~2%) experienced delayed results or unengaged professors.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
With an average rating of 4.64/5 from 14 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise applied learning, employability skills, and support for international students. There are no negative reviews.
With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight excellent facilities and supportive staff. They praise the variety of resources, comfortable environments, and friendly people.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.
The single review is negative, with an average rating of 1/5. It highlights issues with course accreditation not matching advertised claims and experiencing aggressive communication.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I can boldly say that today my research skills have improved drastically because of the skills I learnt in UH. UH not only gives you an opportunity to grow, it gives you the necessary exposure as a student. With the experience garnered from UH, you can compete anywhere in the world. The tutors are exceptionally qualified and always ready to guide you through. Adaora Nwaka LLM,Energy Law and the Environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This is one of the worst companies I have ever had to deal with. I signed up to a course and they delivered something that didn’t fit the description. I contacted BACP and they confirmed that the course was not accredited even though they advertise that it is. There was an awful lot of drama with them and they had been threatening me and trying to intimidate me about leaving a review. I decided to check my reviews on this particular site and came across this one and decided to leave an update that they took no action and it was just threats. Here they come again into my person email trying to intimidate me and threaten me. This type of behaviour won’t be tolerated. I am taking further action and spreading more awareness. The details of the course studied on the next page isn’t accurate for my review. My course isn’t listed. I just needed to spread awareness of my experience and what other students are going through.
