The University of Manchester vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs London Metropolitan University vs University of Hertfordshire - UH vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie
Side-by-side comparison from 962 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging teaching and strong support.
- +Inspiring and motivating learning environment.
- +Great online learning experience and quick registration.
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Supportive and accessible faculty and staff
- +Diverse and multicultural environment
- +Career-focused and practical learning opportunities
- +Supportive tutors and helpful resources
- +Engaging course content with practical application
- +Strong sense of community and social life
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Engaging and supportive faculty.
- +Rewarding learning experience and skill development.
- +Positive and inclusive university atmosphere.
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment with supportive staff.
- +Strong focus on employability and industry-relevant programs.
- +Well-equipped campus with convenient city center location.
- -Outdated or non-functional facilities and insufficient practical experience.
- -Unhelpful or irrelevant course content and poor lecturer engagement.
- -Disorganized course structure and inaccessible professors.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching and poorly structured courses.
- -Inadequate facilities and lack of support from the program office.
- -Insufficient preparation for the real working world.
- -Delayed result publication and unhelpful professors are major concerns.
- -The facilities are outdated and need modernization.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Facilities and resources appear to be outdated or insufficient.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and support exists between different student groups.
- -Limited focus on practical skills and "hard facts."
- -Cumbersome administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
This university garners excellent marks across multiple categories, with **Internationality** and **Location** being its strongest points, both scoring above 4.5. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also received high praise. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. The overall **Value** and **Professors** also received solid, above-average scores.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.5. **Professors** are also highly regarded, with a rating of over 4.3. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest-rated aspect, falling below 3.5. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value are rated moderately well, generally ranging from approximately 3.9 to 4.1.
With outstanding scores in **Internationality** (4.67), this institution also boasts strong performances in **Facilities** (4.47) and **Professors** (4.47). **Value** (4.45) is also highly rated. The **Accommodation** (4.06) is the lowest scoring area, though still a respectable figure, with **Location** (4.14) and **Student Life** (4.17) also performing moderately well.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This university is highly regarded by students, with particularly strong performance in **Professors** (4.25) and **Location** (4.218). Student life and internationality also received excellent scores. The weakest area, though still respectable, is **Accomodation** (3.86). Overall, the university demonstrates a solid reputation across key aspects of the student experience.
Considering the provided scores, this institution excels in its **location**, boasting the highest rating. Student life and internationality are also significant strengths. However, **accommodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for improvement. Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in most aspects, with location being a standout feature.
Approximately 88% of reviews are positive, praising online programs, engaging teaching, and a motivating environment. A small percentage (about 1.3%) expressed dissatisfaction with course content and professor accessibility.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse courses, supportive mentors, and welcoming staff. A small percentage of feedback (~7%) mentions issues with course structure and facilities.
With a 4.42 average rating from 98 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong course content, practical application, community, and social life. A small ~2% of reviews mentioned issues with delayed results and professor engagement.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With a 4.09 average rating from 45 reviews, ~80% of feedback is positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, helpful lecturers, and a positive atmosphere. A small ~4% of reviews expressed dissatisfaction.
With ~93% positive feedback from 139 reviews, students praise the welcoming atmosphere, strong employability focus, and helpful staff. A single negative review cited a lack of "hard facts" in the program.
The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.
I can boldly say that today my research skills have improved drastically because of the skills I learnt in UH. UH not only gives you an opportunity to grow, it gives you the necessary exposure as a student. With the experience garnered from UH, you can compete anywhere in the world. The tutors are exceptionally qualified and always ready to guide you through. Adaora Nwaka LLM,Energy Law and the Environment.
Nothing to show
The University of Lincoln can be likened to a home of everyone. The diversity of students in the school gives a global experience within the small community and so you do not have to travel far and wide when you have the world around you. Studying at Lincoln exposes one to not just academic approach of life but also a rich blend of multicultural and global context of life. If you want to experience the world, come to the University of Lincoln.
Nothing to show
