London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Hertfordshire - UH vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs London Academy of Trading - LAT
Side-by-side comparison from 481 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive lecturers and accessible help services
- +Inspiring learning experience with practical application
- +Numerous opportunities for connection and involvement
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, industry-relevant programmes
- +International environment and global opportunities
- +Inspiring professors and strong teaching quality
- +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
- +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
- +Improved trading profitability and understanding
- +Inclusive and diverse student life opportunities.
- +Practical, industry-focused courses
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Diverse and inclusive student community
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Delayed result publication and administrative issues.
- -Unengaging and unapproachable professors.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Mediocre teaching and perceived lack of educational value.
- -The institution feels like a money-making scheme rather than a place of learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Internationality is a clear standout, receiving the highest rating. Accommodations, while still strong, represent the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like facilities, professors, and value also score very positively, indicating a well-rounded university experience. Location and student life are also rated well, suggesting a good overall environment for students.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This university achieves excellent scores in its facilities and internationality, both receiving a 4.22 rating. Professors are also highly regarded with a 4.11 score. Value for money is rated a solid 4. The weakest areas appear to be student life and accommodation, with ratings of 3.78 and 3.75 respectively, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.
Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.
This institution earns top marks in several key areas, notably its **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Its **Accomodation** and **Value** also score well, with 4 out of 5. The weakest area appears to be **Professors**, rated at 3 out of 5, suggesting this might be an opportunity for improvement.
Considerable strengths are evident in the university's **Internationality**, scoring a high 4.625, closely followed by its **Location** at 4.5. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors** are also robust, both at 4.4375. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest score, registering at 3.8125, with **Accomodation** also receiving a comparatively lower rating of 3.9375. **Value** sits comfortably in the mid-range at 4.25.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (96 reviews, ~92%) highlights a supportive learning environment with approachable lecturers and ample opportunities. A few (~2%) experienced delayed results or unengaged professors.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
About 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic and professional growth, practical application of knowledge, and an international environment. A single negative review criticized the institution as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback highlights inclusivity and a wide variety of societies. This single review found the university impressive and innovative.
Nearly all (approx. 100%) reviews are highly positive, with students praising practical courses, supportive lecturers, and a diverse, inclusive environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I can boldly say that today my research skills have improved drastically because of the skills I learnt in UH. UH not only gives you an opportunity to grow, it gives you the necessary exposure as a student. With the experience garnered from UH, you can compete anywhere in the world. The tutors are exceptionally qualified and always ready to guide you through. Adaora Nwaka LLM,Energy Law and the Environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am an international student who came from nepal to get education here. I have met new people and new friends. The teachers have been very helpful and are always teaching me new stuff. The university here i very nice and there is always new stuff to learn
