Erasmus University Rotterdam - EUR vs Maastricht University - UM vs Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences - HRO vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Codarts Rotterdam
Side-by-side comparison from 232 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse and multicultural student body and international networking
- +Modern facilities and dynamic, fast-paced city environment
- +High-quality, rigorous academic programs with practical application
- +Engaging Problem-Based Learning approach
- +Supportive and international community
- +Approachable and experienced professors
- +Real-world learning, hands-on projects, and industry focus
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Program flexibility and personalized learning paths
- +Engaging academics and strong program content
- +Vibrant international and multicultural community
- +Opportunities for practical application and personal growth
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs and professors
- +Positive campus environment and student life
- +Clear career preparation in maritime industry
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues like lack of housing support are frustrating.
- -Professors are unhelpful and dishonesty is present.
- -Excessive self-study is a major disappointment.
- -Exploitative professors and lack of support for student interests.
- -Disappointing and overly demanding problem-based learning (PBL) method.
- -High pressure, high failing rates, and severe consequences for academic performance.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources impede learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are significant drawbacks.
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support for learning.
Nothing to show
Rankings reveal a university with particularly strong internationality, rated at 4.58. Location is also a standout at 4.42. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.32. Other areas like facilities, professors, student life, and value all received solid ratings above 4.2, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This university garners particularly strong feedback for its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.3. **Value** and **Student Life** also perform well, with ratings exceeding 4.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a considerably lower score of 3.13. **Professors** and **Location** also received solid, above-average ratings.
Campus amenities and its geographical setting stand out with the highest scores. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating. Other areas, including professors, student life, internationality, and value, all scored well above average, indicating a generally positive university experience.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, notably Internationality, which earned a high score. Professors and Location also received very positive feedback. The university's performance in Student Life and Value is also solid. However, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Facilities also received a moderate rating.
Nothing to show
With an exceptional score of 5, the university excels in value for money. Its strengths also lie in the quality of its professors and vibrant student life, both receiving a strong 4.5. Areas for potential improvement, with a rating of 3.5, include its facilities, location, accommodation options, and internationality, though these remain solid.
Nothing to show
~91% of reviews are positive, highlighting international diversity and quality teaching. A small ~2% of feedback mentions concerns about self-study and program support.
Nearly 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting a strong international focus and Problem-Based Learning. Around 9% of feedback is negative, noting issues with organization and professor conduct.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students highlight hands-on learning, real-world experience, and international environments. Some wish for more structured courses or specific technical knowledge.
With a ~100% positive sentiment and an average rating of 4.3/5, students praise the multicultural environment, strong academic programs with practical applications, and supportive faculty. They also highlight engaging extracurriculars and a positive campus experience.
Nothing to show
Based on two reviews, this university receives a 4/5 average rating, with ~100% positive sentiment. Students praise the professional learning environment, good classes, and enjoyable campus life, highlighting career development opportunities.
Nothing to show
The campus is quite large, but not too large. The staff and students are very international, I feel like the education is at a very high level and it's an enjoyable place to be with many of the buildings being modern with a lot of light. I'm in a smaller class with 30 persons and I think it really is a great University to do a Master's at.
One of the most advertised features of the university, it is very pressuring and does not deliver the promised results - everything still has to be learned in the same manner as everywhere else - but here no tutorials are to be missed and PBL is supposed to be a key to successful graduation. Doing twice the work, therefore dividing the attention and time resources, without other options for students struggling with this method - then you are on your own.
Studying International Business we moved to a new building in my third year of University. The new building is amazing and has an encouraging atmosphere. I am constantly surrounded by different cultures and encouraged to meet new people. I was able to design my own learning path, choose topics I was interested in, and study abroad. The course could be a little more structured and I think the university could work on its communication sometimes, but overall I am really satisfied with my decision.
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
