Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad Nacional de Córdoba - UNC vs Universidad Católica de Córdoba - UCC vs Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu vs ICHEC Brussels Management School

Side-by-side comparison from 70 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National University of Villa Maria - UNVM (5.00)
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba - UNC: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Córdoba - UCC: wins 0/7 categories
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu: wins 1/7 categories
ICHEC Brussels Management School: wins 1/7 categories
National University of Villa Maria - UNVM: wins 4/7 categories
Piri Reis University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Administration and Social Policy
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Political Science
Istanbul, Turkey
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.36
4.18
4.17
4.17
3.43
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.09
3.83
3.67
4.33
Win
3.43
4.00
Not rated
Professors
3.91
4.34
4.86
4.67
4.14
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
2.82
4.03
3.86
4.00
4.43
Win
4.00
Not rated
Student life
3.56
3.80
4.17
4.17
3.57
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.73
4.57
4.14
4.33
4.29
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.27
4.18
Win
4.17
3.67
3.71
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong engineering programs and good job prospects
  • +Committed and experienced teaching staff
  • +High-quality education providing a solid foundation
  • +Free, state-funded education with high academic standards
  • +Dynamic learning environments and development of essential skills
  • +Excellent infrastructure and versatile course offerings
  • +Inspiring, passionate professors and engaging teacher-student interaction
  • +Valuable networking opportunities with recognized professionals and enriching events
  • +Supportive campus environment and a strong sense of community
  • +High quality teaching & dedicated professors
  • +Friendly atmosphere & student support
  • +Diverse programs & international opportunities
  • +High-quality, practical courses and supportive professors
  • +International outlook and diverse student body
  • +Numerous travel and internship opportunities
  • +Free tuition and accessibility
  • +Academic excellence and facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor management and administrative support
  • -Outdated curriculum and excessive program length
  • -Unattractive facilities
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of practical skills development.
  • -Poor career guidance and limited industry connections.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and lack of responsiveness from staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support is a common problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder education.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant concern.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized for being ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent and unengaging teaching methods are a major disappointment.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution performs exceptionally well in location, boasting a rating of 4.09. Professors are also highly regarded at 3.91, and value for money receives a solid 3.73. Student life and facilities are rated moderately. However, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.82, followed closely by accommodation at 3.27.

Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with its **Value** standing out as the strongest area, achieving the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also score well, indicating satisfaction in these aspects. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** received the lowest scores, suggesting these are areas with the most room for improvement. Professors are rated highly, and internationality is also a moderate strength.

Academic and student life aspects at this institution are generally well-regarded. Professors receive particularly high marks, indicating a strength in teaching quality. The university also scores well for its facilities, accommodation, and student life. Location, however, represents a comparatively weaker area, alongside its internationality. The value proposition is also positively assessed.

This university garners impressive scores, particularly in its **Professors**, achieving a remarkable 4.67. **Location** and **Value** also stand out with strong ratings of 4.33. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Student Life** are well-regarded at 4.17, with **Internationality** at a solid 4. However, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.67.

This university garners its highest marks in **Internationality** (4.43) and **Value** (4.29), suggesting a strong global presence and perceived worth. **Professors** also receive a commendable rating (4.14). Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 3.43. **Student Life** (3.57) and **Accommodation** (3.71) fall in the mid-range, indicating a solid but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

This institution garners excellent marks, with perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and student life, alongside a strong value proposition. Accommodation and internationality also receive positive assessments. Location, while still rated well, stands out as the comparatively weakest aspect among its strong offerings.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.69, ~62% of reviews are positive, praising good education and experienced professors. Around 15% are negative, citing outdated curricula and poor program management.

With 33 positive reviews out of 35, students praise academic excellence and free education. One negative review cited outdated curriculum and limited practical skills, representing ~3% of feedback.

Nearly all (90%+) student feedback is positive, highlighting excellent networking opportunities, dedicated professors, and supportive classmates. Some mention impressive campus space and valuable curriculum. No negative feedback was recorded.

All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the friendly atmosphere, involved professors, modern facilities, and diverse programs like medicine and engineering. Internship and Erasmus opportunities are highlighted.

With a 4/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback, reviews highlight excellent education, attentive professors, and high-quality, applicable courses. Opportunities for travel and an international outlook are recurring positive themes.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised. Positive feedback highlights its aspirational academic excellence and excellent campus facilities.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
31%
34%
75%
50%
14%
100%
0%
4★
31%
60%
13%
50%
71%
0%
0%
3★
23%
3%
13%
0%
14%
0%
0%
2★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
8%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close