Abo Akademi University - AAU vs Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Centria University of Applied Sciences vs University of Eastern Finland

Side-by-side comparison from 92 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK (4.90)
Abo Akademi University - AAU: wins 3/3 categories
Aalto University: wins 0/3 categories
South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK: wins 0/3 categories
Centria University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/3 categories
University of Eastern Finland: wins 0/3 categories
University of Turku: wins 0/3 categories
Turku University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: French
Espoo, Finland
4.50
Read more reviews
44 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: BHC in Nursing
Best programme: BA Business and Marketing
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Best programme: Information Technology
Best programme: Applied Social Science
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.54
4.81
4.50
4.33
4.25
4.50
Location
5.00
Win
4.33
4.56
4.50
4.00
3.88
3.50
Professors
5.00
Win
4.21
4.93
4.00
4.33
4.25
3.50
Internationality
5.00
4.43
4.74
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Student life
5.00
4.55
4.50
4.50
5.00
3.71
4.50
Value
5.00
4.40
4.78
5.00
4.00
4.13
4.50
Accommodation
5.00
4.40
4.46
5.00
4.33
3.88
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty/staff
  • +Excellent facilities and central location
  • +Welcoming international environment and diverse programs
  • +High academic quality and supportive professors.
  • +Academic freedom and interdisciplinary learning opportunities.
  • +Diverse and international community.
  • +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
  • +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
  • +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
  • +Approachable and experienced faculty
  • +Practical and flexible learning opportunities
  • +Supportive environment with good facilities
  • +Practical study experience with supportive faculty and accessible campus facilities.
  • +Welcoming and diverse campus environment fostering social opportunities.
  • +Efficient education and proximity to nature for leisure.
  • +Approachable professors & strong academic programs
  • +Welcoming city & positive student community
  • +Good accommodation & proximity to campus
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects.
  • +Industry-relevant programs and career preparation.
  • +Innovative, student-centered approach.
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of support and resources hinders academic success and well-being.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is common.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resource allocation are consistently criticized.
  • -A lack of effective teaching and curriculum relevance is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is irrelevant or too theoretical.
Rating summary
What students say

Exceptional ratings paint a picture of a top-tier institution. This university achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every surveyed category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No single area stands out as significantly stronger or weaker than the others, as all aspects are consistently rated at the highest level.

With a well-rounded set of scores, this institution particularly excels in Student Life and Facilities, both receiving ratings above 4.5. Location and Internationality also show considerable strengths, scoring over 4.3. The academic aspect, represented by Professors, is the lowest rated category, though still a solid 4.21. Accomodation and Value are rated identically, indicating a consistent experience in these areas.

This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.

With outstanding marks in Accommodation and Value, this institution clearly excels in those key areas. Facilities, Location, and Student Life also received excellent scores, indicating a well-rounded positive experience. Professors and Internationality earned solid, though slightly lower, ratings, suggesting room for minor improvement in these specific aspects. Overall, the feedback points to a highly desirable university.

This institution garners exceptional scores, notably achieving a perfect 5 for Student Life. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also highly rated at 4.33. Location and Internationality are solid at 4, with Value also receiving a 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value at 4.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Facilities and professors are particularly well-regarded, both receiving 4.25. Internationality is also a positive, scoring a 4. Value for money is also strong at 4.125. The weakest areas appear to be student life (3.71) and location and accommodation, both rated at 3.875.

Overall, this university garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in its **Internationality** (5.0), with equally impressive scores for **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** (all 4.5). The **Value** for money is also highly rated at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement are **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving a score of 3.5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Five out of six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the supportive environment, helpful staff, and excellent infrastructure.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~91% rating it highly. Students praise its excellent teaching, diverse community, and academic freedom to explore various subjects. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a cozy, small campus with approachable, practically experienced teachers and modular study options. The university offers a broad international network and practical learning through teamwork.

All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5 stars. Students highlight practical study experiences, excellent welfare and social activities, and a welcoming, diverse campus environment.

All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise well-structured programs, approachable professors, and a strong sense of community. The city of Turku is also frequently mentioned as a positive aspect.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the two reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight practical, industry-relevant education and hands-on learning experiences. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
57%
89%
50%
67%
25%
50%
4★
33%
34%
11%
50%
33%
75%
50%
3★
17%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Great combinations of business and tech

I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.

My experience studying nursing at Xamk.

Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.

Innovative, caring and multicultural environment

Centria UAS is a good university where students feel free to develop themselves and learn useful knowledge. The school has a broad Erasmus network and other partners around the world. Professors at Centria are qualified and enthusiastic in their lectures. They are always willing to help and encourage students in any problems. The theory is practically applied in every lesson via teamwork, presentations, and assignments. Cheap accommodation and easy to access to the school due to a good location. Staff are very friendly, helpful and polite. I have enjoyed a great time at Centria and went on a Double degree exchange program in France which would be obviously a great opportunity for my career prospects. About Kokkola, it is a small town with all warmhearted and helpful people. I always feel safe when staying here. This place is like my second home.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close