Universitè Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - UCBL1 vs Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML vs ISARA vs INSEEC Business School vs EKLYA School Of Business

Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: INSEEC Business School (4.40)
Universitè Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - UCBL1: wins 3/6 categories
Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML: wins 2/6 categories
ISARA: wins 0/6 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 1/6 categories
EKLYA School Of Business: wins 0/6 categories
Digital College: wins 0/6 categories
CESI: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemistry
Best programme: MBA Master of Business Administration
Lyon, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Paris, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
4.67
Not rated
3.43
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.33
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.64
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.33
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
2.33
4.33
Win
Not rated
4.07
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.64
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.67
Win
4.33
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong science and technology programs
  • +Supportive professors and academic environment
  • +Diverse student body
  • +Practical application and industry relevance
  • +Diverse academic programs and extensive choices
  • +Supportive environment and accessible services

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Communication from staff is often poor and unhelpful.
  • -Poor communication and unhelpful administrative staff are frustrating.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content feels irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas, notably in **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value**, all receiving a rating of 4.67. **Professors** and **Location** also garnered strong scores. However, **Student Life** emerged as a significantly weaker aspect, with a rating of 2.33. **Internationality** received a moderate rating of 3.33.

This institution shines with outstanding ratings in its facilities and location, both receiving a near-perfect score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.3. However, the ratings indicate professors are the weakest area, with a score of 3, while the overall value is rated a respectable 4.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5 based on 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise good facilities, well-equipped libraries, and a conducive environment, though some note older buildings and a serious atmosphere.

With a 3.67 average rating from 3 reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong academic programs and diverse educational opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
20%
0%
0%
21%
0%
0%
0%
4★
60%
67%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
20%
33%
0%
43%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
program is good, but social life is dead

The university itself is a bit outdated and the atmosphere can be quite serious. It can be difficult to enjoy the social aspect of university life when you're focused on a demanding academic program. However, it's important to remember that there is a diverse group of students at the university, with a variety of backgrounds and interests. It's possible to find a niche and connect with like-minded people, even in a more traditional academic environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close