National Aviation University vs Teesside University vs Juilliard School vs Qassim University vs King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Side-by-side comparison from 61 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent faculty and engaging teaching methods
- +Valuable practical experience and career preparation
- +Supportive learning environment and strong community
- +Accessible lecturers and supportive career services
- +Practical, industry-focused programs with career preparation
- +Affordable city living and convenient campus facilities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Excellent engineering programs and facilities
- +Supportive administration and alumni network
- +Good professors and grading practices
- +Flexible study programs balancing personal and professional life
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors with real-world focus
- +Diverse student body and engaging university activities
- +Flexible study options for balancing work and life
- +Supportive and welcoming community
- +High-quality nursing program with hands-on experience
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor English proficiency among professors.
- -Lack of lecturer and student care support
- -Outdated educational facilities
- -Safety concerns due to high crime rates
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects are common concerns.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor quality of education
- -Disregard for student well-being
This institution's ratings present a mixed picture. Its strongest points are location, earning a respectable 3, suggesting good accessibility and surroundings. However, areas such as accommodation, professors, facilities, student life, and internationality all received a 2, indicating a need for significant improvement in these crucial aspects of the student experience. The value also received a 2, reflecting concerns about the return on investment.
This university achieves excellent marks in key areas, with Facilities standing out at 4.49. Professors (4.27) and Internationality (4.33) also received strong ratings. While Location and Student Life are well-regarded around 4.13-4.19, Accomodation presents the weakest area with a score of 3.84. The overall value is rated favorably at 4.18.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its accommodations and international student experience, both receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and professors are also well-regarded, scoring 4. Student life and value are solid at 3 and 4 respectively. The primary area for improvement lies in its location, which received the lowest score of 2.5.
Academic excellence shines through with professors receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also well-regarded, alongside internationality and value for money. Location and accommodation, while still positive, represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still solid, scores. This indicates a generally strong offering with particular strengths in teaching quality.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Accomodation, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Student Life and Professors also stand out with strong scores of 3.75. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating at 3.5, though still respectable. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positive picture.
The single review indicates a highly negative experience. The reviewer cited old equipment not meeting program needs and professors with poor English proficiency, even in an English-taught program. This represented ~100% of feedback, resulting in a 1/5 average rating.
The vast majority of reviewers (~96%) highlight accessible lecturers, supportive services, and enjoyable city amenities contributing to independence and success. A small minority (~4%) reported issues with lecturer support and campus safety.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With one positive review, students highlight good engineering programs, labs, and infrastructure. The average rating is 3.5/5 stars, with ~50% positive sentiment. Campus life was noted as a bit boring.
With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students highlight program flexibility and supportive professors. Some minor points mention less active student activities and occasional exam concerns.
Most reviews are positive (~75%), highlighting flexibility for work-study balance and personal/professional growth, particularly in the nursing program. Some negative feedback exists (~25%), citing disorganization and a focus on profit.
Nothing to show
The approachable teachers and the facilities are top-notch. The majority of my studies were during COVID-19 so student life can't be assessed. Accommodations in Middlebrough are cheap and very affordable when compared to other places and other universities. The course modules were very helpful except for 3D interactive visualization which I really don't think is applicable as a data scientist and can be replaced with SQL instead.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
If you have the option to study in Poland, then do not enroll in this school. This school has been a pain for many international students. They are an unorganized institution, and I do not even want to start explaining why they are already on the probationary list with the Polish government. Instead of providing higher education services to students, they tend to focus more on earning money from them rather than delivering high-quality education. You would be better off studying at other universities instead of this one. They have changed their name; it is now Powiślańska Akademia Nauk Stosowanych.
