Tampere University - TUNI vs Aalto University vs Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Tampere University of Technology - TUT

Side-by-side comparison from 101 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK (4.90)
Tampere University - TUNI: wins 1/7 categories
Aalto University: wins 0/7 categories
Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK: wins 0/7 categories
South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK: wins 3/7 categories
Tampere University of Technology - TUT: wins 0/7 categories
Centria University of Applied Sciences: wins 2/7 categories
VAMK University of Applied Sciences: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Espoo, Finland
4.70
Read more reviews
35 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: BHC in Nursing
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Energy Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.58
4.40
3.50
4.79
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
3.94
4.06
4.33
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
2.00
Professors
4.19
4.11
4.17
4.92
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.06
4.31
4.33
4.75
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.74
Win
4.28
4.17
4.54
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Value
4.23
4.37
3.67
4.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
4.13
4.25
4.00
4.42
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging academic programs with expert and approachable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and supportive student community
  • +Inspiring campus atmosphere and active student culture
  • +Independent learning, flexibility, and practical, hands-on experiences
  • +Strong sense of community, readily available support, and active student life
  • +Excellent facilities and multidisciplinary, diverse course opportunities
  • +Strong sense of community and support
  • +Excellent teaching and learning atmosphere
  • +Welcoming international environment and good facilities
  • +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
  • +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
  • +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive professors and practical learning
  • +Global opportunities and accessible location
  • +Personal development and useful knowledge acquisition
  • +Industry connection and practical experience
  • +Relevant, real-world focused curriculum
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues exist.
  • -Outdated facilities are a concern.
  • -Quality of teaching has declined.
  • -Administrative & management issues disrupt learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder progress.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and limited course offerings disappoint students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a persistent problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

Student life stands out as the university's strongest surveyed category, closely followed by excellent facilities. Location received the lowest rating among the assessed areas. The university also garners positive feedback for its professors, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all of which received solid scores.

This institution demonstrates a solid reputation across multiple facets. Areas like Facilities and Student Life received particularly high marks. Internationality and Value also stood out positively. While still strong, Professors were rated slightly lower than other categories. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and appealing environment for students.

The university scores well across multiple aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a rating of 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also rated highly at 4.17. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Value** at 3.67. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.

This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution garners strong marks, with accommodation and value standing out as exceptional strengths, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality are all rated highly, demonstrating a consistently positive experience across these key aspects.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **internationality**, achieving a perfect score, and its **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation**, all receiving high marks. Conversely, the **location** stands out as its weakest area, indicated by a lower rating. Student life and overall value are rated respectably in the middle tier.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, supportive staff, and excellent facilities. A very small percentage of feedback (about 3.2%) mentions a decline in teaching quality.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92%), with students praising flexible learning, excellent facilities, and active student life. A few reviewers mentioned that courses sometimes lack depth.

Reviews indicate a strong sense of community and helpful staff, with ~74% of feedback being positive. Some suggestions for improvement include better funding for facilities and further development of international programs.

All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating and no negative feedback (~0%), students praise freedom to develop, practical learning, and supportive professors. The university's global network and accessible location with affordable accommodation are also highlighted.

This single review offers a positive perspective, highlighting strong industry connections and relevant, real-world focused coursework. The average rating is 4/5, with 100% of feedback being positive.

Rating distribution
5★
55%
54%
29%
88%
0%
0%
0%
4★
29%
40%
14%
12%
0%
100%
100%
3★
13%
11%
57%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Student

Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!

Nothing to show

My experience studying nursing at Xamk.

Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.

Nothing to show

Innovative, caring and multicultural environment

Centria UAS is a good university where students feel free to develop themselves and learn useful knowledge. The school has a broad Erasmus network and other partners around the world. Professors at Centria are qualified and enthusiastic in their lectures. They are always willing to help and encourage students in any problems. The theory is practically applied in every lesson via teamwork, presentations, and assignments. Cheap accommodation and easy to access to the school due to a good location. Staff are very friendly, helpful and polite. I have enjoyed a great time at Centria and went on a Double degree exchange program in France which would be obviously a great opportunity for my career prospects. About Kokkola, it is a small town with all warmhearted and helpful people. I always feel safe when staying here. This place is like my second home.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close