GEM Alpine Business School vs SKEMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs Excelia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 262 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse faculty and global insights
- +Innovative and relevant curriculum with real-world application
- +Strong networking and international opportunities
- +Practical, career-focused programs and skill development
- +Engaging student life and impactful associations
- +Strong academic faculty and international opportunities
- +Excellent professors, classes, and facilities.
- +Diverse international student community and cultural immersion.
- +Well-structured programs and ample opportunities for professional development and city exploration.
- +Supportive professors and practical, relevant coursework
- +Strong international environment and diverse student community
- +Numerous opportunities for personal growth and engagement
- +Small class sizes and close-knit learning environment.
- +Practical, real-world teaching methods with professional exposure.
- +Vibrant student life and international, open-minded environment.
- +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Unique multi-city European study experience
- +Job advancement and market-relevant skills
- +High-quality faculty and a sense of community
- +Strong research methods and technological focus
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities are a consistent problem.
- -Administrative and management issues lead to disorganization and frustration.
- -Poor communication from the institution causes confusion and unmet expectations.
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including communication and exam organization.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Unorganized program structure and overwhelming course load.
- -Lack of practical training and outdated facilities.
- -Unresponsive professors and poor management.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication from staff and administration.
- -Lack of adequate support and resources.
- -Empty and irrelevant courses with unqualified teachers.
- -High tuition fees for poor value.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
- -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance. Student life stands out as a particularly strong area, closely followed by professors and overall value. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. The university also scores well in facilities, internationality, and location.
This university receives high marks for its professors and internationality, with ratings of 4.42 and 4.35 respectively. Location and facilities are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating solid performance. The weakest area is accommodation, which receives a score of 3.59.
Regarding its overall assessment, the institution performs best in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Value** (4.16). Professors also receive a high mark (4.03). The weakest area identified is **Accomodation** (3.47), though Facilities also scored relatively lower (3.85). Student Life and Location received solid ratings in the mid-range.
The university demonstrates exceptional strength in **Internationality**, achieving a score of 4.6. Student Life also garners high marks, rating at 4.37. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.8. Other areas, including Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value, all receive positive ratings, generally falling between 4.1 and 4.3.
With strong performance in **Location** and **Student Life** scoring an impressive 4.27, this institution offers a vibrant environment. **Professors** also received a solid rating of 4.06. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area with a rating of 3.31, indicating room for improvement in student housing facilities. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a moderate range.
This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its faculty, international environment, and outstanding facilities and location, all receiving a perfect or near-perfect score. Student life also ranks highly, contributing to a positive overall experience. The primary area for improvement lies in accommodation, which received a lower rating compared to other aspects of the university. The overall value is rated very favorably.
With a 4.34/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, valuable faculty insights, and innovative, tech-aligned courses. Some highlight group work stress and limited exchange program admission.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, valuable student associations, and international opportunities. A small fraction of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions concerns with management, communication, and organization.
With an average rating of 4.19/5, roughly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent classes, professors, and facilities. One negative review expressed disappointment with a lack of practical training and professor engagement.
With a 4.36 average rating from 25 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students highlight engaging courses, supportive teachers, and a strong international environment. Some administrative processes could be improved.
~75% of 16 reviews are positive, highlighting a close-knit learning environment, vibrant student life, practical teaching methods, and international exposure. One review (~6%) expressed dissatisfaction with course relevance and teaching quality.
Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the program for providing valuable job skills and career advancement. They also highlight competent professors and interesting events.
Very good program offering rich training in different sectors of the commerce sector. The establishment has good infrastructure. She offers us good working materials for our projects. The Grenoble campus is not the best in France, but still very good There is a gym, classes, well equipped, amphitheatres, quite large and a beautiful cafeteria, it's not great luxury, but it has everything you need In our program, especially my year, we are lucky to have very good teachers who listen and who train us in an excellent way. This school nevertheless lacks international students compared to the top 5 of École de France, a business
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
Nothing to show
