Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad Nacional de La Plata - UNLP vs Atilim University vs Yale University vs Mangrove Institute of Science and Technology - MIST

Side-by-side comparison from 71 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Yale University (4.50)
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de La Plata - UNLP: wins 0/7 categories
Atilim University: wins 0/7 categories
Yale University: wins 7/7 categories
Mangrove Institute of Science and Technology - MIST: wins 0/7 categories
UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE LA PLATA - UCALP: wins 0/7 categories
Morehead State University - MSU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Materials Engineering
Best programme: Aerospace Engineering
Ankara, Turkey
3.80
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
41 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.30
3.38
3.40
4.36
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.20
3.88
2.60
4.24
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.80
4.38
4.20
4.54
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.70
4.00
4.10
4.27
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.50
4.13
3.33
4.48
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.60
4.38
3.60
4.49
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.30
3.38
3.40
4.24
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong engineering programs with good job prospects
  • +Dedicated and experienced teaching staff
  • +Flexible learning options and improving infrastructure
  • +Demanding yet rewarding academic programs and excellent professors
  • +Comprehensive curriculum and supportive learning environment
  • +Value of free public education and its international recognition
  • +High-quality education and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Opportunities for international study and career advancement
  • +New and technologically advanced campus facilities
  • +Dedicated and inspiring faculty mentors
  • +Vibrant and supportive student community
  • +Exceptional academic rigor and research opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
  • -Outdated curriculum and excessively long program duration.
  • -Unattractive and uninviting building facilities.
  • -Overly high pressure and politized environment.
  • -Dismantled and outdated facilities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are a constant source of dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of essential resources and outdated technology hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are prevalent concerns.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners its highest marks for **Location** (4.2), a key strength. Professors are also well-regarded at 3.8. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score (2.7), indicating an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities and Accomodation received moderate ratings, while Student Life and Value fall in the middle ground.

This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its academic offerings and student experience, with Professors and Value both receiving a high score of 4.375. Student Life is also well-regarded at 4.125. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities and Accomodation, which scored lowest at 3.375. The university also scores well in Internationality and Location.

A review of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels in the quality of its professors (4.2) and its international atmosphere (4.1). However, the location (2.6) is identified as the weakest area. Other aspects like facilities (3.4), student life (3.3), accommodation (3.4), and value (3.6) received solid, above-average scores.

With strong performance across the board, this institution excels most in its **Professors** (4.54) and **Value** (4.49). **Student Life** (4.48) also garners excellent marks. The areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, ratings include **Facilities** (4.36), **Internationality** (4.27), **Accomodation** (4.24), and **Location** (4.24).

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews indicate positive experiences with education, job prospects, and teaching staff (~67% positive). Some negative feedback (~16.7%) mentions outdated curricula and program management issues. The average rating is 3.67/5.

University reviews are largely positive (~75%), highlighting demanding yet effective professors and flexible learning. A small percentage (~12.5%) of feedback notes high pressure and facility issues.

With ~60% positive feedback, students highlight good education and qualified lecturers. Some desire more practical training and campus social spaces. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.54/5 from 41 reviews, nearly all (~93%) feedback is positive. Students praise inspiring instructors, a strong sense of community, and supportive faculty, with no negative reviews recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
63%
20%
59%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
13%
40%
37%
0%
0%
0%
3★
25%
13%
40%
5%
0%
0%
0%
2★
8%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close