Boise State University vs SKEMA Business School vs Stevens-Henager College - SHC vs Schiller International University vs Idaho state university
Side-by-side comparison from 152 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and experienced professors
- +Active campus life with clubs and activities
- +strong international exposure & opportunities
- +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
- +valuable alumni network & career support
- +Accessible and supportive educators
- +Abundant learning resources
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Supportive professors & ample library resources
- +Well-organized classrooms
- +Strong internship opportunities
- +exceptional, supportive faculty
- +transformative, holistic program approach
- +intellectual rigor and personal growth
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
- -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and productivity.
- -Inflexible policies and lack of student support are major drawbacks.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
Exceptional strengths are evident in its **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 2. The university also garners a solid 4 for **Value** and a respectable 3 for its **Professors**.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its Professors, Location, Accomodation, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, Facilities and Student Life are areas with slightly less positive feedback, both scoring a 3. The university offers a well-rounded experience with notable advantages in several key aspects.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution achieves top marks. It excels uniformly with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. With no weaker areas identified, the university presents a consistently outstanding profile, indicating satisfaction across the board for its offerings and environment.
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, internationality, and value. These strengths suggest a robust academic environment with excellent accessibility and global outlook, all at a high value for students. Conversely, the university's weakest points are its facilities, student life, and accommodation, all of which scored zero. This indicates significant areas for improvement in campus infrastructure, social engagement, and housing provisions.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive reviews. Students highlight strong CS professors and a vibrant campus with many activities. Racial diversity is noted as low.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.
This university has received one positive review, with an average rating of 5/5. The reviewer praised the variety of resources, helpful teachers, and timely communication. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
This university has a single review, which is overwhelmingly positive, resulting in a 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights excellent professors and library resources.
With a 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review praises the transformative PhD program, highlighting exceptional faculty and unique educational approaches. No negative feedback was provided.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
