Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS vs University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore - UET vs Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD vs Beaconhouse National University vs Skans School of Accountancy - Nil

Side-by-side comparison from 78 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD (5.00)
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 1/5 categories
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore - UET: wins 3/5 categories
Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD: wins 1/5 categories
Beaconhouse National University: wins 0/5 categories
Skans School of Accountancy - Nil: wins 0/5 categories
Lahore Leads University: wins 0/5 categories
University of Education Lahore: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Fashion
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Education in Educational Leadership
Category ratings
Facilities
4.44
4.07
4.50
4.50
4.00
3.00
4.50
Location
4.50
Win
4.33
4.00
3.71
3.67
3.00
4.00
Professors
4.00
4.30
5.00
Win
4.38
3.67
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.60
4.15
Win
4.00
2.88
3.33
1.00
4.00
Student life
4.58
4.44
5.00
4.63
3.67
3.00
5.00
Value
4.17
4.52
Win
4.50
4.13
3.67
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.76
4.15
Win
4.00
3.00
4.00
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Critical thinking and intellectual freedom
  • +Rigorous academics and competitive environment
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programmes
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical and foundational curriculum
  • +Encouraging and collaborative learning environment
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with excellent learning opportunities
  • +Highly valued graduates in the market
  • +Top choice for fashion design and related programs
  • +Supportive and judgment-free faculty fostering practical learning
  • +Vibrant campus environment with diverse extracurricular activities
  • +Emphasis on academic growth and personal development opportunities
  • +Knowledgeable and passionate instructors
  • +Suitable program recommendations
  • +Professional environment

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive teaching and academic focus
  • +Improvement in punctuality and information flow
  • +Resolution of student issues
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a common complaint.
  • -The administration and management are often criticized for their inefficiency and lack of support.
  • -A curriculum that is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered leads to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are lacking or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of engagement and ineffective teaching methods are disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to frustration.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum or teaching quality is a recurring point of dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

With impressive scores in several areas, this institution excels particularly in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving marks above 4.5. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are the areas needing the most improvement, with ratings of 3.76 and 3.6 respectively. **Professors** and **Value** fall comfortably in the middle range of the provided data.

Analysis of the university's ratings reveals a generally positive student experience. Student life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest score. Conversely, facilities are rated lowest, though still a respectable 4.07. Other categories, including professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all received favorable scores, indicating a well-rounded university environment.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and student life. Facilities and value for money are also highly regarded. The university presents a solid offering in terms of accommodation and internationality, though its location, while good, is rated slightly lower than other aspects.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life and facilities, both scoring above 4.5. Its professors and value for money also received solid ratings. However, accommodation and internationality are notable areas for improvement, with scores significantly lower than other categories. Location also received a moderate rating.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its facilities and accommodation, both receiving high marks. Its location, student life, and value for money are also well-regarded, averaging a solid 3.67. The weakest area identified is internationality, which scores slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a generally positive profile with specific areas of excellence.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in **Student Life** with a perfect score. Facilities also stand out at an impressive 4.5. Conversely, while still strong, Professors, Location, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value all hover around a solid 4. This suggests a vibrant student experience and excellent resources, with other aspects performing reliably well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all (91%) student reviews praise LUMS for its transformative education, critical thinking encouragement, and supportive faculty. Students value the demanding academics and diverse campus community, finding the experience rewarding despite challenges. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4.59 average rating from 27 reviews, ~96% of feedback is positive. Students praise supportive faculty, practical curriculum, and excellent skill-building opportunities. There are no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for fashion programs, citing supportive staff and excellent learning opportunities that lead to market-valued graduates.

All eight reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight positive academic growth, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and a vibrant campus environment with ample extracurricular activities.

With a high average rating of 4.67/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise professors' strong subject knowledge and passion, and appreciate personalized program recommendations that align with budget and facilities.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight effective teaching and a supportive environment.

Rating distribution
5★
57%
63%
100%
25%
67%
0%
50%
4★
31%
33%
0%
75%
33%
0%
50%
3★
11%
4%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close