Université de Montréal vs HEC Montreal vs School of Digital Arts, Animation and Design - NAD-UQAC vs Greystone College vs TAV College
Side-by-side comparison from 83 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Diverse and comprehensive course offerings
- +Practical learning opportunities and resources
- +Diverse and well-rounded program offerings
- +Strong career preparation and job market focus
- +Engaging professors and ample student opportunities
- +Industry-relevant opportunities and professional preparation
- +Supportive and attentive faculty guidance
- +Effective teaching and supportive professors
- +Comprehensive programs and extra learning materials
- +Excellent staff support and professional development preparation
- +Teaching excellence and faculty dedication
- +Interactive and engaging learning environment
- +Personalized attention and academic success
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Limited class options and poor social life.
- -Outdated and depressing campus facilities.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -There is significant dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -Poor communication and a lack of administrative support create frustration.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient individual attention hinder learning.
- -Disorganized program and entry-level content.
- -Low academic rigor and lack of depth.
- -Basic English level not ideal for advanced learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff create frustration.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Overall, the institution garners positive feedback with a strong showing in both Facilities and Professors, both scoring above 4.2. Location and Internationality also received favorable ratings around 4.08. Student Life is rated a solid 4.0. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a score of 3.71. Value for money is also rated well, at just over 4.0.
This university exhibits a strong performance across most surveyed areas. Student life stands out as its highest-rated aspect, closely followed by value and facilities. Accommodation and location, while still positive, represent the university's comparatively weaker areas, though all ratings remain robust. Internationality and professors also received favorable scores.
Overall, the university scores well in several key areas. Its strongest aspects are professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are identified as areas with moderate ratings. The university also performs well in terms of location and value.
This university garners top marks in several key areas, notably **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving scores above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores very highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest aspect, with a rating of just over 3.2. **Facilities** also fall on the lower end of the spectrum compared to other metrics. **Professors** are well-regarded, and **Value** is rated reasonably well.
Overall, the university demonstrates exceptionally strong performance across most surveyed aspects. It received perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value. The weakest area, while still positive, is Internationality, rated at a commendable 4. This suggests a highly desirable institution with outstanding offerings in nearly every dimension, with a slight opportunity for enhanced global engagement.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
With a 4.22/5 average, ~92% of reviews are positive, citing engaging lecturers, helpful personnel, and a friendly academic atmosphere. A small fraction (~3%) mention limited course options and a depressing campus.
With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 18 reviews, ~83% highlight diverse management and social programs, intimate class sizes with professor interaction, and numerous student events and scholarships. Some mention career focus and unique degree paths.
With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly regarded by students, who praise its industry opportunities and career preparation. ~100% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teachers.
Most students praise the enriching teaching, supportive staff, and comprehensive programs. Positive experiences highlight helpful professors and professional development. A small fraction found the program to be entry-level and lacking organization.
With a single review, this university received a 4/5 average rating. The feedback was entirely positive, highlighting teaching excellence and a dynamic learning environment.
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
Nothing to show
HEC Montréal's Supply Chain Logistics program is highly regarded for its excellent faculty, who bring a wealth of knowledge and professional experience to the classroom. The program is well-connected with industry leaders, offering students valuable networking opportunities. It emphasizes practical learning over theory, ensuring that students gain hands-on experience and real-world skills. Overall, it's a professional and comprehensive program that prepares students effectively for careers in supply chain management.
Nothing to show
I attended Greystone college in Vancouver and now I am searching for my coop work experience. The professors were knowledgeable and passionate about their subjects, and the classes were challenging but also engaging. One of the positive things is that in addition to learning updated topics, you also meet people from different parts of the world. Also there are plenty of extracurricular activities to get involved in as a volunteer, and they also hold job fairs for students to contact companies in the field. Finally, one of the things I would like them to improve is the the curriculum preparation workshops, where they should mention more the reality and difficulties of the market when looking for work. I would definitely recommend this college to anyone looking for a quality education in a supportive environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
