London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Aberdeen vs Robert Gordon University - RGU vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Salford
Side-by-side comparison from 494 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +High-quality academic programs and knowledgeable faculty
- +Diverse, inclusive, and supportive learning environment
- +Engaging course content and collaborative classmates
- +Experienced and supportive staff
- +Practical projects and relevant industry knowledge
- +Friendly and inclusive campus environment
- +Industry-relevant courses for job readiness
- +Positive learning atmosphere and helpful, knowledgeable professors
- +Valuable international exposure and personal/professional development
- +Engaging professors and strong academic support
- +Diverse course offerings and relevant hands-on learning
- +Vibrant campus atmosphere and extracurricular opportunities
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff cause frustration.
- -Lack of career support and irrelevant coursework hinder future prospects.
- -Poor quality education and value for money.
- -Mediocre educational standards.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
Nothing to show
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This university receives generally strong ratings from students, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.69) and **Professors** (4.59). **Location** and **Value** also score highly. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 4.17, though this remains a positive score. Overall, the student experience appears well-regarded across most metrics.
This institution garners excellent feedback in several key areas. Facilities and Internationality stand out with the highest scores. Professors and Value also receive strong ratings. Student Life and Location are well-regarded, though not as high as the leading categories. Accomodation received the lowest, yet still respectable, score.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas. Its Facilities, Professors, and Value are all rated consistently well at 3.83. Internationality stands out as a significant strength with a perfect score of 4. Conversely, Accomodation is a weaker point, rated at 3.2, with Location also receiving a comparatively lower score of 3.33. Student Life falls in the middle with a rating of 3.5.
This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas. Its location is a standout strength, achieving the highest rating. Professors, facilities, and value are also highly regarded, all scoring above 4.4. Student life and internationality present solid, positive feedback. The weakest area, with a rating of 3.9, is accommodation.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With an average rating of 4.63/5 from 43 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students praise outstanding academics, engaging courses, and supportive faculty and classmates. Some noted limited campus facilities during peak times.
With a high average rating of 4.49/5, approximately 91% of 35 reviews are positive. Students frequently praise supportive and experienced staff, engaging courses, and helpful facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 3.67/5 average, most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting personal growth, industry-relevant courses, and a good learning atmosphere. One negative review (~16.7%) criticizes the school as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With a 4.43/5 average rating from 82 reviews, ~99% are positive, praising engaging classes, passionate and helpful professors, and a vibrant campus with opportunities. A single negative review found the education standard could be better.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
The University of Aberdeen is a unique learning environment for students interested in want to deepen their knowledge. The lecturers in Aberdeen a really business-like. As a student who has been in the University since 2020, I can confirm that students get value for their tuition through the sacrifices of the lecturers and the academic environment.
My experience as Robert Gordon was quite stress free and insightful.I received lots of coaching and mentorship from Lecturers and senior colleagues ,all the materials I needed to make a headway were available to me ,my lecturers were very friendly and open to any form of guidance and academic assistance needed at any point in time.I am really grateful for my choice of school and all the support I received from Robert Gordon.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
