Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ vs Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs University of Cândido Mendes - UCAM vs Fluminense Federal University - UFF
Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Extensive opportunities for research and extracurricular projects.
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors and mentors.
- +Strong industry connections and company partnerships.
- +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong career opportunities and project encouragement
- +Good laboratories and infrastructure, despite some facility issues
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Highly regarded programs and diverse course offerings
- +Support for students and accessible opportunities
- +Qualified faculty and research focus
- +New facilities and resources
- +Enjoyable learning experience
- +Excellent teaching and well-structured programs.
- +Abundant student amenities and resources like the library.
- +Supportive environment and helpful staff.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Concerns exist about the quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency creates uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of communication and unsupportive staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of adequate resources and support
Overall, this university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** and **Professors**, both receiving very high marks. **Internationality** is also a significant strength. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring the lowest. **Facilities** and **Location** received moderate ratings, while **Student Life** is also a positive aspect.
This university presents a mixed but generally positive rating profile. Its strongest area is consistently Professors, receiving an excellent score. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest point. Other aspects such as Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately, while Location and Value show solid performance. Internationality also scores mid-range.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
This institution receives its highest marks for **Location**, scoring a perfect 5. **Value** also stands out with a strong rating of 4.71. Conversely, **Accomodation** is a notable weak point, receiving the lowest score at 2.57. Ratings for **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Facilities** are generally positive, while **Internationality** falls in the middle range.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength across key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value. The university also boasts a strong international presence, indicated by its high rating in that category. While overall performance is outstanding, a slightly lower score in internationality suggests this is an area with room for further enhancement.
This university garners top marks for its facilities, professors, and perceived value, all receiving perfect scores. Student life and location are also considered strong points, rated at a solid 4. However, the university struggles significantly in the accommodation category, scoring a zero, and its internationality is rated low at 2.
All 16 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.44/5. Students highlight enriching experiences, valuable classes, and numerous opportunities for research and projects. Some mention infrastructure issues and teaching methods as minor drawbacks.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Recurring positive themes include excellent teachers and good infrastructure. Some minor concerns were raised about room ventilation and bathroom conditions.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.14/5, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent courses, research opportunities, and support programs. Negative feedback is minimal, with no 1-2 star reviews.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has received overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights a positive learning experience, particularly with newly established courses and facilities.
This university has a single positive review, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights great teachers, ample student amenities, and a well-structured program with diverse learning activities. A well-stocked library and helpful librarians were also praised.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show