Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Uninassau

Side-by-side comparison from 197 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas: wins 1/6 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG: wins 0/6 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/6 categories
Uninassau: wins 0/6 categories
Universidade Estadual de Londrina: wins 4/6 categories
Universidade Federal de Rondonópolis: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Economics
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Administration and Social Policy
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Campina Grande, Brazil
3.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Pharmaceutical Sciences
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.63
Win
4.22
4.33
4.40
3.67
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.63
4.24
4.56
4.70
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.50
4.39
4.33
4.60
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.25
4.40
3.56
4.60
2.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.43
4.15
4.00
3.90
3.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.50
4.07
4.67
3.90
4.67
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.14
3.60
3.50
3.00
3.67
4.50
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated faculty and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Strong market preparation and career opportunities
  • +Well-maintained infrastructure and campus life
  • +Practical, industry-focused learning and career opportunities
  • +Diverse international environment and personal growth
  • +Excellent teaching quality and supportive student life
  • +High-quality teaching and dedicated professors
  • +Excellent preparation for the job market
  • +Strong academic and research focus
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +engaging teaching and interesting subjects
  • +flexible learning options
  • +supportive campus environment
  • +Inclusive and diverse student community
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +High-quality and relevant academic programs

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact learning.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered by some students.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and exam management.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
  • -Disorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with inconsistent evaluation methods.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are prevalent concerns.
  • -Instruction quality and course content are frequently cited as disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are often cited.
  • -Course content is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a significant concern.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Exceptional ratings for **Facilities** and **Location** highlight key strengths, both scoring 4.625. **Professors** also received a strong 4.5. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are well-regarded at 4.429 and 4.25 respectively. **Accomodation**, while still a positive score at 4.143, represents the area with the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with these metrics.

With a well-rounded set of evaluations, this university demonstrates particular strengths in **Internationality** and **Professors**, both receiving exceptionally high scores. **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest rating, suggesting room for improvement. Other categories like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value are all rated positively, indicating a generally favorable student experience.

Perceptions of this institution reveal a strong emphasis on its **location** and **value**, both scoring exceptionally high. Student life and internationality also receive positive, though slightly lower, marks. The weakest areas appear to be **accommodation** and **facilities**, which, while still rated above average, are the lowest-scoring aspects in this evaluation. Professors and overall facilities also received solid scores.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

This institution demonstrates remarkable strength in its **Value** for money, scoring an impressive 4.67. **Professors** are also highly regarded, with a rating of 4.33. Conversely, the university's **Internationality** received the lowest score at 2.67, indicating this is an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated moderately well, around 3.67.

This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. It shines with perfect marks for its professors and student life, and boasts high ratings in internationality, facilities, location, and accommodation. The sole area receiving a comparatively lower score, though still strong, is its overall value.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.33/5, approximately 88% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent professors, a complete curriculum, and strong market preparation. No negative feedback was provided.

The vast majority of reviews (~91%) praise the university for personal and professional growth opportunities, strong industry links, and excellent teaching quality. A small percentage of feedback (~2.4%) mentions poor management and communication.

With an average rating of 4.6/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise teaching quality, dedicated professors, and excellent facilities. A few mentioned a need for more professional education alongside academic focus.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

With 3 reviews and an average of 3.33 stars, feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). One positive review praised good teaching and interesting subjects, while noting administrative shortcomings. No negative reviews were provided.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted inclusive learning environments and supportive faculty. Excellent infrastructure and a relevant curriculum were also noted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
56%
50%
82%
60%
0%
0%
0%
4★
22%
42%
0%
40%
33%
100%
0%
3★
22%
7%
18%
0%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close