Future University in Egypt - FUE vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Al-Azhar University - Azhar vs Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University vs Assiut University

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Future University in Egypt - FUE: wins 0/7 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 6/7 categories
Al-Azhar University - Azhar: wins 0/7 categories
Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University: wins 0/7 categories
Assiut University: wins 0/7 categories
October University for Modern Sciences and Arts: wins 1/7 categories
High Institute For Computers and Management Information: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Dentistry
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Art History
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Best programme: Bio-Pharmaceutical Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.67
Win
3.92
4.50
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.50
5.00
Win
4.30
3.50
4.00
3.67
Not rated
Professors
4.50
4.33
4.17
4.00
3.86
4.67
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.75
5.00
Win
4.08
3.00
4.14
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.33
Win
4.27
4.00
3.71
3.67
Not rated
Value
4.25
5.00
Win
3.75
4.00
3.57
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.25
5.00
Win
3.73
3.50
3.57
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and clinics, with accessible and free services.
  • +Abundant and high-quality free learning resources, including textbooks.
  • +Modern facilities and industry-oriented curriculum with international collaboration.
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +International diversity and cultural exchange
  • +Strong academic programs and practical training
  • +Supportive lecturers & practical, rewarding courses
  • +Modern facilities & equipment
  • +Strong faculty and diverse programs
  • +Excellent medical and clinical training
  • +Positive campus environment and facilities
  • +Outstanding professors and hands-on learning
  • +Rigorous and comprehensive pharmacy program
  • +Supportive faculty and practical skill development

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly cited.
  • -Communication gaps and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication plague students.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in need of improvement.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking in practical application.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Lack of resources & support
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its academic offerings and environment. Professors received an impressive 4.5, alongside equally high marks for location and value at 4.5 and 4.25 respectively. Accommodations also scored well at 4.25. The weakest area is internationality, rated at 3.75, while facilities and student life garnered solid 4s.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This institution demonstrates robust strengths, particularly in its **Location**, which received a high rating of 4.3, and a vibrant **Student Life** scoring 4.27. **Professors** are also well-regarded at 4.17. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the area needing most improvement, with a rating of 3.73, closely followed by **Value** at 3.75 and **Facilities** at 3.92. **Internationality** also scores well, reflecting a diverse environment.

This institution shines particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving a high score of 4.5. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4. The **Internationality** score, at 3, represents the area with the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, along with **Location** and **Accomodation**, which both sit at 3.5. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with notable strengths and some areas for potential improvement.

This institution garners its highest marks for **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving over 4.0. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated at a respectable 3.5, representing the lower end of its evaluated strengths. The university also scores well in **Student Life** and **Value**, indicating a generally positive overall perception across these metrics. Professors are also well-regarded, with a score close to 3.9.

Overall, this institution receives strong evaluations, particularly in **Professors**, which stands out with a high rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also score well, indicating solid strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area. **Location** and **Student Life** are rated moderately, suggesting room for improvement alongside the positive aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are highly positive, giving an average of 4.5/5 stars. Students praise excellent faculty, modern facilities, and valuable resources like free textbooks. Limited extracurricular activities were a minor point.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~74% of 12 reviews rating it 4–5 stars. Students praise knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and good campus communities. No negative reviews were provided.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted life-changing experiences, academically rewarding courses combining theory and practice, and supportive lecturers. Minimal negative feedback was noted regarding administrative delays.

Six of seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.14/5. Students praise diverse learning, quality faculty, and strong medical programs. Limited funding for research supplies was noted once.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are largely positive, highlighting outstanding professors and rigorous, comprehensive programs that effectively blend theory with practical skills. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
42%
50%
29%
33%
0%
4★
50%
0%
33%
50%
57%
33%
0%
3★
0%
0%
25%
0%
14%
33%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close