Kenyatta University vs Daystar University vs Murang'a University of Technology vs Laikipia University vs Management University of Africa

Side-by-side comparison from 286 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC (5.00)
Kenyatta University: wins 0/5 categories
Daystar University: wins 0/5 categories
Murang'a University of Technology: wins 0/5 categories
Laikipia University: wins 0/5 categories
Management University of Africa: wins 0/5 categories
Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC: wins 5/5 categories
Pioneer International University - PIU: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Nairobi, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
227 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Nairobi, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
41 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Software Engineering
Best programme: Agriculture
Best programme: Development Studies
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.41
4.46
3.83
3.20
4.00
5.00
Win
4.50
Location
4.55
4.28
4.29
4.00
5.00
5.00
3.00
Professors
4.36
4.27
4.14
4.20
4.33
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.22
4.34
3.43
2.80
3.67
5.00
Win
4.00
Student life
4.27
4.22
4.00
3.40
3.33
5.00
Win
3.50
Value
4.41
4.51
3.86
4.00
4.33
5.00
Win
4.50
Accommodation
3.95
3.90
3.86
2.75
3.33
5.00
Win
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +- Knowledgeable and supportive lecturers
  • +- Well-structured and balanced curriculum
  • +- Opportunities for innovation and practical application
  • +Student-centered approach and preparedness for disruptions
  • +Engaging and practical academic programs with knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Welcoming and supportive learning environment for personal growth
  • +Strong academics and dedicated lecturers
  • +Vibrant campus life and sense of community
  • +Quality IT and applied science programs
  • +Practical learning and quality education in key programs
  • +Conducive, serene, and quiet learning environment
  • +Welcoming and helpful staff
  • +Engaging faculty and supportive staff
  • +Opportunities for strong student-staff and peer interaction
  • +Dynamic and diverse learning environment
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable professors
  • +Extensive student support and resources
  • +Engaging learning environment
  • +Accessible faculty and personalized learning
  • +Practical, hands-on education
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including disorganization and delays.
  • -Unfair and punitive grading systems compared to other institutions.
  • -Lack of specialization in some programs, leading to career uncertainty.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are prevalent concerns.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness from staff create a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Ineffective teaching and outdated curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues causing frustration.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Unsupportive or unavailable instructors negatively impact student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong ratings across multiple facets, with Location being its standout strength at 4.55. Professors and Facilities also received high marks, scoring 4.36 and 4.41 respectively. Value and Student Life are similarly well-regarded. The area requiring the most improvement is Accomodation, which received the lowest score at 3.95. Internationality also sits in the mid-range.

This institution receives high marks across most surveyed areas, with "Value" being the strongest at 4.51. "Facilities" also score exceptionally well at 4.46. "Internationality" and "Professors" are also rated favorably. The weakest area identified is "Accomodation," receiving a score of 3.9. "Student Life" and "Location" fall within a similarly mid-range, solid performance.

With several strong points, this university garners high marks for its location, closely followed by its professors and student life. Accommodation and value also received solid scores. However, internationality is a noted area for improvement, as is the rating for facilities. Overall, it presents a mixed but generally positive picture, with a few distinct areas of excellence and some opportunities for growth.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings and overall value, with particularly high ratings for Professors (4.2) and Value (4). Conversely, the university faces challenges in its Accommodation (2.75) and Internationality (2.8) scores, indicating areas for potential improvement to enhance the student experience. Other aspects like Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately.

This institution receives high marks for its outstanding location, earning a perfect score. Professors and overall value are also strong points, both rated at 4.33. Facilities are well-regarded at 4. Student life and accommodation, however, are areas for potential improvement, scoring 3.33. Internationality is rated moderately at 3.67.

With perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received top marks. There are no weak areas identified, indicating a consistently outstanding university experience and offering.

An overall strong performance is evident, with the university excelling in **Professors (5/5)** and **Facilities (4.5/5)**, and offering excellent **Value (4.5/5)**. Areas that appear less developed include **Location (3/5)** and **Student Life (3.5/5)**, which received moderate ratings. Internationality also scored well at 4/5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.46/5 from 228 reviews, ~98% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers, well-structured courses, and supportive campus life. Minimal negative feedback noted issues with grading systems and project stage disorganization.

With an average rating of 4.46/5, ~97.6% of reviews are positive. Students praise student-centered approaches, prepared remote learning, engaging academics, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned institutional influences.

University reviews show high satisfaction, with ~100% positive feedback. Students highlight dedicated lecturers and solid academics. Some noted areas for improvement in facilities and results.

With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise the quality education, practical learning, and dedicated faculty, especially in Agriculture, Education, and Business Studies. The serene learning environment and well-equipped facilities are also highlighted.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting a dynamic learning environment and supportive faculty interactions. No negative feedback was received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight knowledgeable professors and a rich array of resources for success, including excellent library, labs, and strong support services.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise small class sizes, accessible faculty, and a supportive, hands-on learning environment. The university offers diverse courses and good campus maintenance.

Rating distribution
5★
57%
61%
43%
60%
33%
100%
50%
4★
34%
29%
57%
20%
33%
0%
50%
3★
7%
7%
0%
20%
33%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Life in KU

It was amazing, the professors were great. The school compound was extremely big and walking from one lecture hall to another was a big challenge. The long ques during meals at the mess was crazy. There is this thing called missing marks, you could visit exam office a million times without help.

Servant Leadership

Daystar University gtaught me the importance of expressing myself and respectfully disagreeing with opinions that i djid not subscribe to. The university taught me that as much as i am leader i should not be afraid to be hands on on any given task in life and work space. A servant leader leads by example and does not instill fear to those he is leading.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University and Friendships

The college experience for me was the greatest platform to create friendships with not only fellow student but with professors too. The university staff was intentional in interacting with students, in class and outside class. The university organized events that made these interactions possible and easy. This was one of the best things in my campus life

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close