Tanta University vs Moscow State University of Printing Arts - MGUP vs Akhbar El Youm Academy vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Budapest Metropolitan University

Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Tanta University: wins 0/1 categories
Moscow State University of Printing Arts - MGUP: wins 1/1 categories
Akhbar El Youm Academy: wins 0/1 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 0/1 categories
Budapest Metropolitan University: wins 0/1 categories
Barcelona Executive Business School - BEBS: wins 0/1 categories
German University Bangladesh: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: BA in Humanities
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Animation
Best programme: HR Management and Leadership
gazipur, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
2.56
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.67
3.33
3.50
Not rated
Location
3.67
5.00
Not rated
5.00
3.33
5.00
Not rated
Professors
3.40
5.00
Not rated
4.33
3.67
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
2.80
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Student life
2.56
5.00
Not rated
4.33
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
2.90
5.00
Not rated
5.00
3.33
4.67
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
3.00
2.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive learning environment and dedicated professors
  • +Balance of academic and social life
  • +Positive overall experience and gratitude
  • +Engaging classes with practical application
  • +Exceptional professors encouraging discussion and offering support
  • +Rewarding academic challenges

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
  • +Modern, open-minded environment
  • +Supportive & engaged professors, humanistic & diverse environment
  • +Practical learning, real-world application, and engaging classes
  • +Accessible (affordable, online, evening classes) and helpful support

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of practical learning and feedback.
  • -Administrative and management issues create an unwelcoming atmosphere.
  • -Insufficient space and outdated facilities detract from the learning environment.

Nothing to show

  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across several key metrics, this institution presents a mixed performance. The highest-rated aspects are **Location** (3.67) and **Professors** (3.4). Conversely, **Facilities** and **Student Life** received the lowest scores, both at 2.56. **Accomodation** (3) and **Value** (2.9) fall in the middle range, with **Internationality** (2.8) slightly lower.

Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in every evaluated aspect. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5. With such uniformly excellent feedback, identifying a weakest area is not possible; the university excels across the entire spectrum of student experience.

Nothing to show

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.

This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. Its value proposition is also very strong. However, accommodation presents the most significant weakness, rated considerably lower. Facilities also received a middling score.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 40% of reviews are positive, praising the supportive academic environment and personal growth. However, approximately 10% of feedback highlights issues like insufficient practice and unhelpful student affairs.

With a 3/5 average rating, reviews highlight engaging classes and helpful professors (~33% positive). However, some negative feedback points to issues with budget allocation and library facilities (~33% negative).

Nothing to show

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.

All reviews are positive, highlighting helpful professors, a humanistic and diverse approach, and a practical, affordable learning experience. The average rating is 4.67 out of 5.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
20%
33%
0%
100%
0%
67%
0%
4★
20%
0%
0%
0%
33%
33%
0%
3★
50%
33%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
1★
10%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

The history of my studies at the MUP im. Ivan Fedorov

Entering this educational institution into the correspondence form of training with the use of distance educational technologies (DOT), I expected a lot of interesting lectures, seminars and skype conferences with teachers. However, the reality of me admitted a lot of surprise. Video-lectures turned out to be very small, Skype conferences were not in sight. Instead of exams and preparation for them, intermediate tests for 10-15-20-25 questions are used, which after the n-th passage begin to be repeated, the exam in total consists of 40-45 assignments.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close