Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA vs Universidad Favaloro vs San Martin National University - UNSAM
Side-by-side comparison from 66 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Constant administrative support and efficient problem resolution
- +Modern, comfortable, and well-organized campus facilities
- +Valuable practical experience through industry connections and real-world projects
- +Strong engineering programs with good job prospects
- +Dedicated and experienced teaching staff
- +Flexible learning options and improving infrastructure
- +High academic standards and quality programs
- +Passionate and caring professors
- +Public and tuition-free access
Nothing to show
- +Modern campus and well-equipped facilities
- +High-quality, progressive academic programs and updated curriculum
- +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
Nothing to show
- +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
- +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
- -Lack of updated and functional facilities.
- -Poor communication and responsiveness from administration and management.
- -Inconsistent and unclear academic policies and support.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
- -Outdated curriculum and excessively long program duration.
- -Unattractive and uninviting building facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive administration create frustration.
- -Lack of clear academic support and guidance leaves students feeling lost.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
This university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback from its students. Its strongest areas of performance are clearly **Location** and **Value**, both receiving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **Accommodation** are also highly rated, demonstrating excellent physical resources and living conditions. **Professors** represent the weakest area, though still scoring a commendable 4.43, indicating that while teaching quality is good, it's not as exceptional as other aspects. Student life and internationality are well-received, reflecting a vibrant and diverse campus experience.
This institution garners its highest marks for **Location** (4.2), a key strength. Professors are also well-regarded at 3.8. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score (2.7), indicating an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities and Accomodation received moderate ratings, while Student Life and Value fall in the middle ground.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
An assessment of the university reveals a highly international environment, with a near-perfect score for Internationality. Professors, Student Life, and Value also received excellent ratings. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Facilities are rated well, but not exceptionally.
Nothing to show
This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.
~74% of reviews praise consistent support, modern facilities, and valuable industry experience. No negative feedback was received.
Reviews indicate positive experiences with education, job prospects, and teaching staff (~67% positive). Some negative feedback (~16.7%) mentions outdated curricula and program management issues. The average rating is 3.67/5.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the modern campus, well-equipped facilities, updated curriculum, and professional faculty. They also highlight progressive programs, student well-being initiatives, and opportunities for career development.
Nothing to show
The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
