University of Nis - GAF vs Palm Beach State College vs University of Nis Faculty of Electronic Engineering vs Faculty of Sports and Physical Education University of Nis vs Government Graduate College Pasrur

Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Palm Beach State College (4.70)
University of Nis - GAF: wins 7/7 categories
Palm Beach State College: wins 0/7 categories
University of Nis Faculty of Electronic Engineering: wins 0/7 categories
Faculty of Sports and Physical Education University of Nis: wins 0/7 categories
Government Graduate College Pasrur: wins 0/7 categories
University of Niš Faculty of Law: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Sociology
Lake Worth, Florida, United States
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
Best programme: Computer Engineering and Informatics
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.15
3.29
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
4.64
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
4.38
3.43
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.54
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Win
4.46
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
4.46
3.43
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.80
2.57
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and diverse modules
  • +Encouraging professors fostering individual growth
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty.
  • +Affordable tuition and flexible learning options.
  • +Friendly and welcoming student and staff community.
  • +Strong career & hiring opportunities
  • +Support for student events & exchanges

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content and delivery are often seen as irrelevant or poorly executed.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty for students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and communication from staff is a problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across the board, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, achieving a perfect score of 5 in all evaluated areas. This indicates outstanding performance in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. There are no apparent weak areas, as every category received the highest possible rating.

This university garners impressive scores across most aspects, with Accommodation standing out as its strongest area, receiving a near-perfect rating of 4.8. Location and Student Life also score highly. Conversely, Facilities, with a rating of 4.15, represents the lowest-scoring category. The overall evaluation indicates a well-rounded institution, particularly excelling in student comfort and experience.

A university assessment reveals a strong emphasis on location and student life, both scoring 3.86. Professors and value also received solid ratings around 3.43. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a score of 2.57, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and internationality fall in the middle, with scores of 3.29 and 3.00 respectively.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, positive feedback (~100%) highlights excellent faculty and professors encouraging growth. One reviewer mentioned diverse modules but noted a lack of chemistry labs. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a ~100% positive sentiment and an average rating of 4.69/5, students highlight supportive faculty, affordable tuition, flexible learning, and a welcoming environment. Minor delays in assistance were noted in some feedback.

With an average rating of 3.29/5, ~74% of feedback is positive, highlighting opportunities for hiring and exchange programs. Some suggest improving practical job-relevant knowledge and sector efficiency.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
69%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
31%
29%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
71%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close