London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Stirling vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Wrexham Glyndwr University
Side-by-side comparison from 393 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Marketable courses and high academic standards
- +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
- +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
- +Beautiful campus and natural surroundings
- +Supportive faculty and quality academic programs
- +Strong sense of community and opportunities for friendship
- +Great student life and personal development support
- +Positive lecturer interaction and learning experiences
- +Opportunities and a beautiful city for exploration
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Amazing and supportive staff
- +Positive learning experience and engaging courses
- +Beautiful campus environment
- +engaging and clear teaching
- +helpful feedback and support
- +well-organized and comprehensive curriculum
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
- -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
- -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
- -Courses heavily advertise future programs and have poor assessment design.
- -Little opportunity for practical experience or placements is provided.
- -The curriculum lacks practical application and sufficient assessment of material.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources impede learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum design fail to meet student needs.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of effective communication
- -Misleading course accreditation and aggressive company response
- -Poor course delivery and unfulfilled promises
Nothing to show
With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.
This institution is highly regarded for its **internationality**, boasting a rating of 4.61. Other strong areas include **facilities** (4.31), **location** (4.16), and **student life** (4.16). **Professors** and **value** also received solid scores around 4.0. The **accommodations** are rated as the weakest area, with a score of 3.78.
This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in **Facilities** with a perfect score of 5. Professors, student life, accommodation, and value are also highly regarded, all receiving 4.5. While internationality and location are rated well at 4, they represent the areas with the least room for improvement.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location**, earning a perfect score, and **Professors**, receiving a high rating. Areas such as **Student Life** and **Internationality** also stand out positively. However, the university's **Value** is rated as its weakest point, with a score of 3. Facilities and accommodation received moderate, middle-ground scores.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution received a uniform rating. Its strengths and weaknesses are therefore equally represented, with all categories achieving the same score. The consistent marks suggest a balanced experience, with no single area significantly outperforming or lagging behind others according to the given data.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting the beautiful campus and supportive environment. A small portion of feedback (~3.5%) expresses concerns about course structure and assessment methods.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight great student life, the beautiful city, and excellent lecturer interaction, leading to personal development and ample opportunities.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlighted stunning facilities and friendly people. Brilliant lecturers and insightful courses were also noted.
The single review is negative, with an average rating of 1/5. It highlights issues with course accreditation not matching advertised claims and experiencing aggressive communication.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
In my first year at the university, I stayed in Polwarth House; the lowest-priced accommodation building available, at £88 per week. I shared a thin hallway, one bathroom and an extra shower room, and a small kitchen with three other students. There was no common room, although the kitchen was enough for all of us to comfortably hang out in. The bedroom was spacious; containing a 3/4 bed and a desk that stretched from the medium-sized wardrobe to the wall. There were more than enough plug sockets, and plenty of space to fit my drying rack and guitar. The sink area was small, but I could always use the one in the shared bathroom if I needed a bigger area. Compared with other similarly-priced accommodations' bedrooms, I feel like I got my money's worth out of it. Everyone in the building was very sociable and friendly, and it was easy to get to my friends' flats from my own. Most of my close friendships were made at flat parties in Polwarth. It is worth saying that it can get pretty noisy on the weekends - and the noise can carry - but any issues can be sorted out by phoning campus security. I found that a good pair of noise-cancelling earbuds was enough. If you are a student looking to save money, and don't mind the occasional party above you, I can't recommend Polwarth enough.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This is one of the worst companies I have ever had to deal with. I signed up to a course and they delivered something that didn’t fit the description. I contacted BACP and they confirmed that the course was not accredited even though they advertise that it is. There was an awful lot of drama with them and they had been threatening me and trying to intimidate me about leaving a review. I decided to check my reviews on this particular site and came across this one and decided to leave an update that they took no action and it was just threats. Here they come again into my person email trying to intimidate me and threaten me. This type of behaviour won’t be tolerated. I am taking further action and spreading more awareness. The details of the course studied on the next page isn’t accurate for my review. My course isn’t listed. I just needed to spread awareness of my experience and what other students are going through.
Nothing to show
