University of Vaasa - VY vs Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Arcada University of Applied Sciences - UAS vs Hanken School of Economics
Side-by-side comparison from 74 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Relevant and current course content
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +International atmosphere and modern facilities
- +Flexible and multidisciplinary learning
- +Strong foundational and independent learning
- +Supportive community and active student life
- +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
- +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
- +Practical, relevant learning and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Modern facilities and updated resources
- +High teaching quality and experienced lecturers
- +Engaging international environment
- +Helpful support services
- +Industry connection and practical experience
- +Relevant, real-world focused curriculum
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of student support and clear communication is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and poor curriculum design lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
Nothing to show
Consistently scoring perfect marks, this institution excels in all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received top ratings, indicating exceptional strength across the board. No specific areas can be identified as weaker, as all components achieved the highest possible score.
This university receives strong commendations, particularly for its **Student Life** and **Facilities**, both scoring above 4.5. **Accomodation** and **Value** are also highly rated, each at 4.39. **Professors** represent the lowest-scoring area, though still rated positively. The university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in its campus environment and student experience.
This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Professors**, achieving a perfect score. Facilities and Value also receive exceptionally high marks. Conversely, Accomodation is the lowest-rated category. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Internationality are well-regarded, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life, alongside a strong rating for Value. Accommodations are also well-regarded. However, the university's Internationality score is notably lower than other aspects, indicating a potential area for development. The location also received a good, but not perfect, rating.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **internationality**, achieving a perfect score, and its **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation**, all receiving high marks. Conversely, the **location** stands out as its weakest area, indicated by a lower rating. Student life and overall value are rated respectably in the middle tier.
Nothing to show
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 rating. This feedback highlights a well-structured and relevant course, knowledgeable and supportive professors, and valuable international environment and campus facilities.
Students highly recommend the university, praising its multidisciplinary courses and freedom to study outside their major (~90%). Positive feedback highlights independent learning, excellent facilities, and strong community support, with no reported negative reviews.
With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.
All 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight a sense of belonging, welcoming staff, practical learning, and modern facilities. Some mention concern about course scheduling.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised for its excellent teaching quality and strong international environment. Positive feedback highlights engaging academics and helpful support services.
This single review offers a positive perspective, highlighting strong industry connections and relevant, real-world focused coursework. The average rating is 4/5, with 100% of feedback being positive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
In all honesty, my university offers a fantastic level of education, dedicated and extensively knowledgeable lecturers, as well as a spacious, clean, modern campus. These items make it a great place to study. However, one specific trait that bothers me personally is that some of the more important courses are limited to a single period (half a semester), to make space for other courses that I deem unnecessary or that could be optional instead of mandatory. Overall, my experience at Arcada has been outstanding.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
