University of Helsinki vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences vs Arcada University of Applied Sciences - UAS vs Laurea University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 65 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality teaching and research
- +Supportive academic environment and student culture
- +Balance of independence and guidance in studies
- +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
- +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
- +Practical, business-oriented programmes with flexible scheduling
- +Supportive community and accessible guidance from professors and staff
- +High-quality education with experienced teachers and a friendly atmosphere
- +Practical, relevant learning and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Modern facilities and updated resources
- +Supportive and available tutors
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Strong focus on job readiness and success
- +Personalized guidance and support for academic progress
- +Motivating and helpful staff
- +Opportunities for quick graduation
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology were a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and resources hindered learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant concern.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching staff create a negative academic experience.
Nothing to show
The university garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a near-perfect score, closely followed by a robust Student Life. While professors and accommodation also score highly, Internationality represents the lowest-rated aspect, though still at a respectable level. The overall value proposition remains strong.
This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **location** (4.89) and **internationality** (4.8). Facilities and student life are also well-regarded, each receiving a solid 4.0. Accommodation is rated similarly. The weakest area is **professors**, with a rating of 3.7, though the overall value for money remains strong at 4.2.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Professors**, achieving a perfect score. Facilities and Value also receive exceptionally high marks. Conversely, Accomodation is the lowest-rated category. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Internationality are well-regarded, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution boasts exceptional internationality, earning a perfect score. Value is another significant strength, with a rating of 4.67. Professors and student life also received strong scores of 4. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, ratings include facilities, location, and accommodation, all at 3.67.
Exceptional scores were awarded across every aspect of the university. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a uniformly excellent experience with no discernible weak areas, suggesting a consistently high-quality educational environment.
Nothing to show
With 17 out of 19 reviews being positive (~89%) and an average rating of 4.32, students praise the high-quality research and teaching, supportive environment, and city life. No negative feedback was provided.
With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.
With a ~82% positive sentiment, students praise concrete, business-oriented studies and flexibility. They also highlight a supportive, friendly community and a good work-life balance. Limited negative feedback was noted.
All 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight a sense of belonging, welcoming staff, practical learning, and modern facilities. Some mention concern about course scheduling.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 based on 3 reviews, ~67% of feedback is positive. Students praise helpful tutors, real-world project opportunities, and a focus on creativity.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review highlights helpful staff, advice, opportunities, and motivational support. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Helsinki University is a diverse and cozy university with high quality teaching and research. The teachers are intelligent and kind and easy to talk to. The programs and subjects are well planned out and the work load for courses are usually decent, not too much or too little. I also loved the student culture and clubs on the campus. Also. If you ever need help with your studies you can always get help and guidance to plan your studies or solve problems.
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
In all honesty, my university offers a fantastic level of education, dedicated and extensively knowledgeable lecturers, as well as a spacious, clean, modern campus. These items make it a great place to study. However, one specific trait that bothers me personally is that some of the more important courses are limited to a single period (half a semester), to make space for other courses that I deem unnecessary or that could be optional instead of mandatory. Overall, my experience at Arcada has been outstanding.
Nothing to show
This school was very good and helpful, I wanted to graduate quickly and they have helped me achieve this, they gave me advice and opportunities and they were checking in on my progress. Very motivating to be surrounded by the staff.
Nothing to show
