Erasmus Hogeschool Brussel - EHB vs Odisee University of Applied Sciences vs Vrije Universiteit Brussel - VUB vs EIT Digital Master School vs Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management
Side-by-side comparison from 70 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inclusive community and support for diverse students
- +High-quality teaching and artistic focus
- +Vibrant student life and cultural enrichment
- +Practical, real-world learning and applied theory
- +Development of essential workplace skills and programs
- +Strong emphasis on teamwork and international student support
- +Engaging discussions through diversity and expert, passionate lecturers
- +Supportive learning environment with ample student interaction and academic development
- +Rich campus atmosphere and promising career prospects
Nothing to show
- +Strong economics and business programs
- +Supportive faculty and rigorous academics
- +Excellent networking and location
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Discrimination and lack of support from university administration when addressing issues.
- -Poor quality of teaching and lectures, coupled with excessively difficult exams.
- -Lack of practical elements in the curriculum and insufficient individual student attention.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Nothing to show
A varied profile emerges from these university ratings, with its strongest areas being **Internationality** (4.175) and **Location** (4.15). **Facilities** (3.833) and **Professors** (3.825) also received commendable scores. On the other hand, **Student Life** (3.225) and **Accomodation** (3.375) represent areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, while **Value** (3.725) falls in the mid-range.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality (4.75)** and **Professors (4.67)**, alongside an excellent **Location (4.58)**. These areas suggest a globally connected and academically robust environment. Conversely, **Accomodation (3.33)** presents as the least highly rated aspect, indicating potential for improvement in this student support service. Other aspects like Facilities and Student Life fall within a solid, mid-range performance.
Emerging from the data, the university garners its highest marks in **Internationality** (4.38), suggesting a globally connected campus. Solid performance is also evident in **Facilities** (3.98), **Location** (3.96), and **Value** (3.96). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.62) and **Accomodation** (3.51) present areas for potential improvement. Overall, it showcases a good balance with a distinct international strength.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and both accommodation and internationality also score highly with 4.5. The university's facilities are rated at a respectable 4, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
Nothing to show
Three out of five reviews are positive (60%). Students highlight financial and community resources, classroom experience, and cultural diversity as strengths. One review mentioned building infrastructure could be improved.
All 12 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the practical, hands-on learning, real-world application, and preparation for the business world. Specific skills and useful programs are frequently highlighted.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising the green atmosphere, expert lecturers, and diverse environment. A small percentage (~8%) of negative feedback mentions issues with lecturer communication and exam difficulty.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics and networking. Reviews commend knowledgeable faculty and rigorous coursework, though workload can be demanding.
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university gives a hands on experience on learning and applying theory to action,We learn everything for the business world and we work on assignments through the whole academic year, we develop strategies, campaigns and everything you need to know for the business world
To live and learn with international students has been a great experience. However,the professors speak an English which is hard to understand, their lecturers are basically useless. The exams instead are extremely difficult, we were intimidated by the professors with discouraging comments. Taking the exams was loud and chaotic, they did not manage to organise that properly. It looks like a previously good school and program is going down hill. There are passing rates of 15%. Therefore, a interesting, dedicated student body in a bad university.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
