United International Business Schools - UIBS vs KU Leuven vs Erasmus Hogeschool Brussel - EHB vs Vlerick Business School vs Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management
Side-by-side comparison from 123 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Rigorous and enriching academic programs
- +Strong international community and diverse student body
- +Well-experienced professors and practical course content
- +Inclusive community and support for diverse students
- +High-quality teaching and artistic focus
- +Vibrant student life and cultural enrichment
- +Rigorous, well-structured programs with real-world application
- +Expert faculty deeply invested in student success
- +Strong industry connections and career focus
- +Strong economics and business programs
- +Supportive faculty and rigorous academics
- +Excellent networking and location
- +High-quality, practical courses and supportive professors
- +International outlook and diverse student body
- +Numerous travel and internship opportunities
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Excessive workloads and limited study spaces.
- -Poor teaching quality and unhelpful staff.
- -Stressful, high-stakes assessment methods.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are recurring problems.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They express frustration with outdated facilities and resources.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized for being ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This institution achieves excellent scores across several aspects, particularly excelling in Internationality (4.42) and Location (4.32). Value for money also received a high mark (4.29). Conversely, the weakest area appears to be Accommodation (3.61), though Facilities (4) and Student Life (3.90) remain solid. Professors' ratings (3.87) are also respectable.
A varied profile emerges from these university ratings, with its strongest areas being **Internationality** (4.175) and **Location** (4.15). **Facilities** (3.833) and **Professors** (3.825) also received commendable scores. On the other hand, **Student Life** (3.225) and **Accomodation** (3.375) represent areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, while **Value** (3.725) falls in the mid-range.
Boasting exceptional scores, the institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect 5/5 ratings. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance with scores above 4.6. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest ratings at 3.67 and 3.33 respectively. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, particularly in its physical environment and academic/global engagement.
This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and both accommodation and internationality also score highly with 4.5. The university's facilities are rated at a respectable 4, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects.
This university garners its highest marks in **Internationality** (4.43) and **Value** (4.29), suggesting a strong global presence and perceived worth. **Professors** also receive a commendable rating (4.14). Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 3.43. **Student Life** (3.57) and **Accommodation** (3.71) fall in the mid-range, indicating a solid but not exceptional experience in these aspects.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
Most reviews (~74%) praise the rigorous, intellectually enriching academic experience and strong international atmosphere. Limited negative feedback (~5.1%) highlights workload intensity and administrative complexity.
Three out of five reviews are positive (60%). Students highlight financial and community resources, classroom experience, and cultural diversity as strengths. One review mentioned building infrastructure could be improved.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the well-structured, interactive curriculum, expert faculty, and strong industry connections. Some wish for more career focus for MBA students.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics and networking. Reviews commend knowledgeable faculty and rigorous coursework, though workload can be demanding.
With a 4/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback, reviews highlight excellent education, attentive professors, and high-quality, applicable courses. Opportunities for travel and an international outlook are recurring positive themes.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
Nothing to show
KU Leuven provides a rigorous academic experience with a strong international atmosphere. The programs are demanding but intellectually enriching, encouraging independent study. While administrative processes can be complex, the overall environment supports growth for motivated and self-driven students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
