Cardiff Metropolitan University vs Kent Business School vs INSEEC Business School vs Walbrook Institute London vs Bishop Grosseteste University
Side-by-side comparison from 144 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and comprehensive career services
- +Excellent facilities and student life organization
- +Strong academic programs with practical application
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Diverse and enriching culture
- +Good value accommodation and scenic environment
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
Nothing to show
- +Small class sizes and personalized attention
- +Engaging and well-structured courses with enriching opportunities
- +Knowledgeable, approachable tutors and transferable skills development
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and well-structured programs
- +Useful campus facilities and student support resources
- +Rewarding and challenging academic experience
- -Poor communication and slow faculty responses are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
- -Students struggle to access the limited services offered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and communication is a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and clear communication are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
This institution garners praise for its excellent **Facilities**, scoring a high 4.34. Professors also receive strong marks at 4.31, with Location and Internationality also performing well. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are areas with comparatively lower, though still respectable, ratings, falling below 4.0. The overall value is rated at 4.18.
Excelling in several aspects, this university received its highest marks for Location (4.88) and tied for second highest in Facilities and Internationality (4.78). Student Life and Value also scored well, both above 4.3. Areas for potential improvement include Professors and Accommodation, which both received a rating of 4.22.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university presents a strong profile, excelling particularly in student life with a perfect score. Location and value also received very high marks. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Facilities and accommodation received solid, above-average ratings.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Facilities and student life stand out with strong ratings of 4.5. Conversely, the university's professors and accommodation received the lowest scores at 3. The location, internationality, and overall value are rated moderately at 3.5.
With an average rating of 4.14/5 from 77 reviews, ~74% are positive, highlighting a well-resourced campus, helpful faculty, and organized student life. A small ~1.3% of feedback mentioned communication issues.
With a 4.56/5 average from 9 reviews, all feedback is positive. Students praise the great culture, diverse student body, supportive lecturers, and good facilities. Some mention minor areas for improvement, such as teaching standards and late-night food availability.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
With 3 reviews and an average of 4.67/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight improved teaching quality due to small class sizes and enjoyable, well-matched courses with passionate tutors offering transferable skills.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars, feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). Students highlight knowledgeable lecturers, well-structured programs, and useful campus facilities. There is no reported negative feedback.
Professors were very insightful, i formed a good network with my fellow students. The staff really welcomed me in a friendly manner. Business management degree was amazing. I did learn alot in this course, be it basic things or common practices needed in progression for your career. The city is beautiful, it's a student city which really helps you settle in quite easily.
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Not enough teaching staff. Lecturers grade based on racial inclination. Cirencester is a small place with little amenities. Off campus accommodation is expensive. The school's main campus is a bit far from the main town. Course modules are not practical oriented. Good administration and support from the teaching staff
