Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport - AASTMT vs Al-Azhar University - Azhar vs Beni Suef University vs Thebes Higher Institute for Engineering

Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 2/5 categories
Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport - AASTMT: wins 0/5 categories
Al-Azhar University - Azhar: wins 0/5 categories
Beni Suef University: wins 0/5 categories
Thebes Higher Institute for Engineering: wins 0/5 categories
Heliopolis University For Sustainable Development - HU: wins 3/5 categories
Canadian International College - CIC: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
3.74
3.89
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
5.00
3.71
4.14
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.33
4.13
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
3.91
3.78
3.67
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.33
3.48
4.25
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
5.00
4.17
3.56
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
3.64
3.63
4.33
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Practical skill development and future career preparation
  • +Supportive and engaging campus atmosphere with diverse fields of study
  • +Internationally recognized and respected degrees
  • +Accessible professors and heard opinions
  • +Relevant curriculum and qualified teachers
  • +Prestigious Islamic studies legacy and diversity
  • +Practical application of learning and internships
  • +Networking with diverse students
  • +Strong academic reputation

Nothing to show

  • +Broad range of extracurricular and personal development subjects
  • +Emphasis on student well-being and a positive university experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Limited student life and campus facilities.
  • -Lack of parking and dining options.
  • -Insufficient university expansion for student needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are often cited.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors and the institution is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

Review of the university indicates a strong performance in academics, with the highest ratings for **Value** (4.17) and **Professors** (4.13). **Internationality** also scores well at 3.91. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest rating (3.48), suggesting this is an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Accomodation fall within a moderate to good range.

Analyzing the provided ratings reveals several strong points for the institution, particularly in **Student Life (4.25)** and **Location (4.14)**. Professors also received a solid rating of 4. The weakest areas, however, are **Value (3.56)** and **Accomodation (3.63)**, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

Overall, this institution garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Student life, accommodation, and value for money stand out as its strongest areas, all receiving high marks. The university also scores well in facilities and professor quality. Conversely, internationality is the weakest point, with a rating lower than other categories.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in key areas, earning top marks for its facilities, professors, location, and student life, all rated a perfect 5. Value for money also scores highly at 5. However, accommodation presents a significant weakness with a rating of 2, and internationality is a moderate area at 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With a 4.09 average rating from 23 reviews, approximately 83% highlight growth and skill development through challenging coursework and formative experiences. A small amount of feedback (~4%) mentions poor student life and lack of campus activities.

With a ~100% positive sentiment, students praise accessible professors, strong community, up-to-date curriculum, and high-quality instruction. Some highlight its Islamic studies excellence and international diversity. No negative feedback was noted.

With a 3.67 average rating, approximately 67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight the university as a top choice in Egypt, emphasizing practical learning and networking opportunities.

Nothing to show

With one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. This feedback was entirely positive, highlighting an appreciation for diverse, non-major subject offerings.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
30%
33%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
0%
52%
33%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
13%
33%
33%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close